In the first of a 3-session Learning Journey, Erik Fernholm shared honestly about where IDG is right now โ and why a transformation is needed if we want this movement to stay alive, regenerative and truly owned by all of us.
A few years ago, IDG started as a small initiative exploring inner development for systems change. None of us expected it to grow into a global movement with 800+ hubs and so many committed people around the world.
From the outside, the website and big partner logos can make IDG look like a large, well-funded organization with dozens of people in a big Stockholm office. In reality, itโs a tiny team doing what they can with very limited time and resources.
That mismatch has created a real bottleneck.
Erik named a few pieces of this:
- The founding group has been quite homogenous (Northern European, mostly male and white).
- The current, centralized โstartupโ structure is now slowing the movement down instead of enabling it.
- Too many initiatives wait in a โpermission queueโ โ especially those without funding.
The shift: from โIDG does this for usโ to โWE are IDGโ
Erikโs proposal is bold and very aligned with inner development:
- The board will give away its central mandate rather than hold onto it.
- Decision-making and agency move closer to where the work is actually happening โ in hubs, circles, projects, local contexts.
- People get clear mandates to act in coherence with IDG principles, without needing to constantly ask for permission.
***
Unfortunately I couldn't stay for the breakout rooms, but the question that was proposed was this:
"How do we together cultivate the conditions for agency, learning and practise within the movement?"
Let's have this conversation here - in the comments.
And , , , , who were at the call, please share what was discussed in your breakout rooms.