Thank you so much Nadene, this is incredibly useful — and also somehow reassuring, because it confirms that this might be sort of an open space. What you wrote about unions already working with many IDG capacities, but through a different language and history, really resonates. Just recently, I attended a lecture by a union secretary from ver.di — one of Germany’s largest unions and the major service-sector union — focused on union organizing, recruitment, and collective power in "today's world" context. Although she did not use IDG language, many elements felt very aligned: mapping relationships and “white spots” in the institution, creating a small but stable active group that meets regularly, values-based communication, and especially 1:1 conversations based on active listening rather than persuasion. One sentence that stayed with me was that unions grow where people have a “place of encounter”. She also described the union as an “organized form of hope”, which I found very powerful. That connects strongly with the IDG dimensions of Relating and Collaborating — but also with the very practical reality that dignity, trust, courage and hope cannot be built through documents only. They need repeated human spaces — the kind of containers I mostly found in IDG networks like this one. So yes, maybe “inner capacities for social dialogue” or “inner development for just transition / collective voice” could become a very meaningful field. I am taking notes from your answer and will also bring some of this into a union meeting I have next week at my faculty. Thank you again for opening this up so generously 🙌