A lot of people want validation in their fragrance choices because fragrance is personal. We are not just buying a smell. We are buying a mood, a style, confidence, and sometimes even the feeling that we made the right decision. When someone buys a fragrance, especially if it is expensive, hyped, niche, discontinued, or a blind buy, they naturally want to feel like they made a good choice. Nobody wants to feel like they wasted their money or got caught up in hype. So when people post their bottle, SOTD, or collection, sometimes they are not only sharing — they are also looking for reassurance. This is also why it can be hard to take anyone else’s reviews too seriously. A review is not always just an honest breakdown of the fragrance. Sometimes it is mixed with hype, buyer’s remorse, personal bias, a desire to justify a purchase, or a desire for other people to agree with their taste. Some people review something right after buying it, while they are still excited about it. Others may overpraise a fragrance because they paid a lot for it. After all, the community already hyped it, or they want to feel validated in owning it. The same thing happens with clones and inspired-by fragrances, but from the opposite side. Because clones are usually much cheaper, some people want to validate them as being “just as good,” “better than the original,” or “not worth paying for the real thing.” Sometimes that may be their honest opinion, but other times the lower price becomes part of the review. Instead of judging the fragrance completely on quality, depth, blending, performance, and how close it really is, the review turns into proving they made the smarter financial choice. I understand why clones are popular. They let people experience a similar scent profile without spending hundreds of dollars. They can be useful for testing a DNA, wearing something casually, or enjoying a style without using up an expensive bottle. But price can create bias. If someone only paid $30 or $40, they may be more forgiving of rough edges, weaker blending, missing depth, or differences from the original. On the other hand, if someone paid $300 or more for the original, they may want to defend that purchase too.

Hey just want to send a big thank you out to the brotherhood that helped get me to level 9. I have enjoyed this community very much since joining. Special thanks to @Antonio Centeno @Nestor Lopez@Jonathan Ventura @Julio Gutierrez @Lon Chaneyfield @Edward Mooney @Michael LoCascio Sr@Henry Clay@Srinesh C m@Rich Toczynski@Blake Merl @Jeff Beason@Anthony Buntyn @Jeffrey Plotka@Frank Barnett

I’ve have had this one in my collection for ages, but I haven’t gave it a full wear until today. I haven’t been too interested on it because it’s a freshie (note my favorite profile); an alternative to Parfums de Marly Sedley. It has a very enjoyable profile and got me compliments. It opens very fresh, citrusy, minty and herbal. The dry down evolves to a more diffusive and airy light citrusy, mossy, a bit sweeter scent. The projection and longevity are average to the lighter site, even over spraying it. It will need reapplication after 4-5hrs, if you want to be noticed.