Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Royalty Ronin
506 members • $111/month
The Meaningful Man
88 members • $290/m
CreatorFinder AI
20 members • Free
Educated Meatheads
5.9k members • Free
RemotePro™
755 members • Free
Money Mavericks
131 members • Free
Deals Over Clients
264 members • Free
Make Em Beg to Buy
852 members • Free
Found Money Mojo
24 members • Free
82 contributions to Royalty Ronin
1d •
🔥CDOD: 2 New Coffee Dates (and the follow up gold that got'm)
If you don't want Coffee Dates do NOT follow up with folks multiple times. DEFINITELY not 4 or 5x's... Funny enough @Chris Dyson and I were chatting on a call yesterday morning and he was sharing about following up multiple times and just how THAT's where the gold is... NOT in the outreach... It's in your 4th and even 5th follow up that it happens. They SEE your persistence... ...and you're actually demonstrating your expertise. Because what do we do when we're tapping? We follow up! Then on @Travis Sago's call yesterday afternoon he TOO was talking about the gold that's found in the follow up... He even gave us some solid follow ups to use. The past few morning's I've been going tappity tap tap tap on the peeps in my SmartLead account. Woke up to a new Coffee Date request this morning... And after my FOURTH follow up on this guy... I get this response (see the attached image). He ❤️'s my persistence lol... Coffee Date Scheduled. That's two today, plus another one earlier this week. Little does this guy know since I've known Travis I've just been too stupid to stop 😂 In your corner, ~ Tony
1 like • 23h
@Tony Teegarden About what did you make the follow ups about? Looking for ideas for my own followups
1d •
Barrowing Credibility VS. Giving
Goood questionn that came to mind today! I’m wondering what’s better to lead with — and whether one option feels inauthentic. Option 1: Open with social proof (barrowing credibility) “My partner @Tony Teegarden just closed a $126K auction.” (Plus follow-ups around that while testing a new painpoint in each follow-up) Option 2: Lead by giving extra value upfront, building goodwill first. My concern is this: If I lead with Tony’s result, could it create friction? Like - “Why are you telling me about someone else’s result if it isn’t yours?”
0 likes • 1d
@Travis Sago Yeah sure. It was good that you said "Youtube, Webinar, Facebook profile, etc"' because they'd say "I have that, that's me!" without too much personalization. What I'm going to try is Tony's tool which gives insights about what they could do better, copy & paste that snippet. Giving Example: "Hey Travis! You're on YouTube all day long, and I get it. It must be exhausting keeping the audience happy or converting, so I wrote this more specific so people know better where to start (Snippet). I made this because I was reading your About Us page, and wondered where to start. Hope this helps. -Matt Then following up with Dumb idea stuff. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Credibility Example: Hey Travis! Most coaches tell me they're feeling "on" all the time and during client training sessions being used as emotional support pillar. You're doing all this effort to help them the best, and had noticed your Mission to help as many willing fitness coaches be internet figures who are reliable. Think with just one auction over your "Best Figure Athlete" program we can get 5, 6 figures like my partner Tony got 126K (Substack link to it??) -Matt. @Travis Sago Littttle bitttt what's on my mind now, for example.
3d •
Limiting belief
When I'm going to send emails with the giving funnel, are people who I previously targeted who never said anything or ghosted not be annoye
1 like • 2d
@Travis Sago Wel guess that's why things are taking longer for me. Thanks Trav.
0 likes • 2d
@Travis Sago Sure. And Travis could I Barrow Tony's credentials for the work he did, put that on floowmakers with testing one pain point. Isn't that inauthentic emailing?
3d •
"Selling" them on a campaign is HARD!
"Suggesting" a TEST is EASY! This is not 100% true, but 100% useful: You will NEVER, EVER, EVER convince them your campaign will work! But you CAN hear a "Yes." 9 out of 10 times... When you... Explore UPSIDE potential.. Point out their DOWNSIDE... And then... Say... "We can do a Pre-auction post as a test. We'll know in minutes if it will work or not." (or whatever your TEST is.) Then... You know what happens when the test works? They BECOME CONVINCED ALL ON THEIR OWN! And if the test doesn't work? No sweat. You BOTH saved a heap of time! STOP selling them on a campaign. START suggesting a test. You will have so many TESTS your head will spin. A bunch will work out! And they turn into DEALS! Rooting For Ya, Travis
1 like • 3d
@Travis Sago So this means with salessavers/floodmakers "We can pre-send a campaign as a test. We'll know in minutes if it will work or not." Never talk about 3-5 emails without them even said yes before? That's explaining the full plan.
1 like • 3d
@Travis Sago Yes. But better to say one test than 3-5. Or we "We start with one test, we'll know in minutes if it will work or not. If the first test succeeded, we go up to 3-5. Just looking for the way to say it the shortest, mostly understood without going beyond it feeling like a too big of a thing yet.
8d •
CDOD: 25% reply rate on latest email
Had some leads ignore my full giving sequence. So I tested a small batch by making them a straight one sentence offer. 3 replies - 2 positive so far Not bad
0 likes • 7d
@Chris Dyson So you didn't change what Travis recommended to do, but just did that
0 likes • 7d
@Chris Dyson You've seen that work the best compared to "all time" read leads on their list?
1-10 of 82
@matthias-van-cauter-8322
Vending IP Machine -Helping Authors or YouTubers take their pradukts and put them into another income stream (Turn course into AI or Text-Based Guide)
Active 1h ago
Joined Feb 4, 2026
Brussels
Powered by