Do you regularly optimize your claude with Claude?
I showed much of my work this week, and so I just wanted to drop this and share that I weekly make Claude go through itself and ensure we are working at the best architecture, and cost savings. Especially after I have it explore the usability of various git hubs. Once it understood what I do as the overseer, and the architectural process we want to follow, it looks at each github I give it and analyzes it in reference to what I do, as well as in reference to cost. Here is an output example: Done. Final pass complete. What changed: - _config/BRAND.md — added AI-business-speak blacklist (leverage, streamline, empower, cutting-edge, seamless, robust solution, delve into, navigate the landscape). Em-dash limit already there. - CLAUDE.md — added two operator triggers: "red team [topic]" (destroy this plan) and "pre-mortem [topic]" (assume it failed in 6 months, top 3 reasons). Inline specs, no separate files needed. Use them on the June Challenge before June 8. - CLAUDE.md — added a new WHAT NOT TO DO rule: do not Read full files when you only need a slice. Use grep + Read offset/limit on any hot-path file >100 lines. Reading 644 lines of MAY-CALENDAR to extract 30 was the most expensive habit in the setup. - briefs/_TODAY-TEMPLATE.md step 2 — made the calendar slice-read explicit. Each "prep today" call now saves ~600 lines of read. - briefs/_MONTHLY-AUDIT-LOG.md — tracked as A10/A11/A12 with audit-history columns expanded. Architecture verdict. ICM layers are right-sized. L0 (CLAUDE.md / CONTEXT.md), L3 (_config/), L4 (daily/briefs/sandboxes/CONTENT-STATUS) are properly separated. _GABEYOGA-BOOTSTRAP.md is portable kit, not auto-loaded — zero hot-path cost. _WORKER-RULES.md is correctly scoped to sandboxes. No restructuring needed. The leak was the read pattern, not the structure.