Most nutrition guidelines were built to prevent deficiency, not to help you thrive, and protein is the clearest example. A perspective paper in Frontiers in Nutrition argues that current protein recommendations reflect a bare minimum rather than an optimal target. The author notes that the UK's longstanding guideline of about 0.34 grams per pound of body weight was set to maintain nitrogen balance in sedentary people, not to build strength, preserve muscle with age, or support recovery. Contemporary evidence points to substantially higher intakes, often around 0.7 grams per pound of body weight or more, for muscle, healthy aging, and quality of life (I often suggest 1 gram per pound). This is a critical shift in framing. The RDA tells you how to avoid frank deficiency, not how to flourish, and most people reading this are not aiming merely to sidestep disease. They want strength, mobility, and independence that lasts into their later decades. I've recommended protein intakes well above conventional guidelines for years, particularly for older adults working to preserve muscle. A practical way to hit a higher target is to anchor each meal with roughly 30 grams of high-quality protein from sources like eggs, fish, meat, or a clean protein powder you tolerate well. Treat the guideline as the floor, then build well above it.