Well, that's what Halsbury says, but what the f@k would he know, compared to the Administrative gods in ULEZ? DSAR for ULEZ. Let's find out why, from the donkey's mouth. Bring me back the evidence. Subject Access Request (SAR) Template to Transport for London To:Data Protection OfficerTransport for London5 Endeavour SquareLondonE20 1JN[Or submit via TfL's Data Protection Portal or email: DPO@tfl.gov.uk] Date: [Insert Date]Subject: Subject Access Request under Article 15 UK GDPR and Sections 45–47 DPA 2018 Dear Data Protection Officer, I am writing to formally request information and documentation under Article 15 of the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), and the Data Protection Act 2018. Please treat this as a Subject Access Request (SAR). 🔎 Requested Information: I request that you provide me with the following personal data and supporting documentation: 1. All personal data held about me by TfL in relation to any ULEZ, congestion charge, penalty charge notices, or other enforcement activities involving my vehicle (VRM: [Insert Vehicle Reg]). 2. A chronological list of all events or transactions (including notices issued, reminders, charge certificates, or warrants of control) relating to the enforcement actions. 3. All internal notes, metadata, agent remarks, automated enforcement decisions, and audit trails showing how and why enforcement action was initiated. 4. Copies of any correspondence between TfL and enforcement contractors (e.g., Marston, CDER Group, or other third parties) which relate to enforcement against my name or vehicle. 5. All legislative and regulatory authorities or statutory instruments upon which TfL relies to initiate or pursue enforcement action in my case, including but not limited to (i)Any internal or external Equality Impact Assessments (EIA) or Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) reviews conducted prior to or during the enforcement phase against me or my demographic cohort (ii)Any information TfL holds on my vulnerability status, special category data or other assessments TfL may have considered before or during the enforcement process.

I am currently in the midst of selling my propert and have accepted or excepted an offer but it is only two weeks in (I never can work those two words out?😂) . However this property is far from sold no signed contracts money exchanged etc. I have been approached and messaged by local people I barely know mentioning the sale of my property as they have had flyers through the door with a picture of my house with the estate agent highlighting they have sold it! This was not a sale I wanted everyone in my area to know about despite advertising it on line. This doesn’t mean the process of my private property being sold should be shared every step of the way. Especially when anything could happen to to stop the sale going ahead. I’m aware I’ve signed a contract to sell it however this is false advertising by them and I’m not happy about them sharing this so early on. Any ideas about formal progress. I’m currently checking the AI for ideas on how to progress this because as I mentioned I’m not happy 🙈😂😂😂 I

Hi Guys Ive been disputing paying my council tax since I moved into my house back in 2022 and I am now following Peters guidance to take the Council to court. I am slightly daunted but determined to keep going! After sending the first letter : Final Legal Review of Equity-Based SARs. I receieved the following response which I am unsure if to respond to this? or to just send the next letter. I would really apprecate any advice particualy if youve been through a similar situation. Thanks in advance. This is the respons:Thank you for your Subject Access Request (attached) that was received on 15 January 2026. Clarification Required We are unable to consider your request in its current form. In order to consider your request under the Subject Access regime, we need you to narrow and redefine your request so that it relates to your personal information. The SAR process provides a right of access to an individual's own personal information; it is not a dispute resolution process nor is it a process for discussing speculative questions relating to determining whether council tax debt collection relies on legally defective liability orders. Please read the information below: Information and assistance on how to pay council tax is published on our website for information and this may be of help to you: Council Tax - Durham County Council Support to help you pay your Council Tax - Durham County Council Please note that the council does not require consent to process your personal data. There are six lawful basis we can use. Depending on the statutory process involved, we rely on 'processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller.' See Article 6 (e) of the GDPR. You can find the applicable privacy notice on our website here: https://www.durham.gov.uk/dataprivacy

Morning peeps, is it possible to scan documents into the chatbot so I give accurate information in my queries as opposed to just an overview?

Lowell took over my case from Vanquis Bank last autumn, though I don’t owe to this credit card company. Vanquis rejected my last payment nine months ago, charged off the account, and sold my account data to Lowell against my wishes. I explicitly told Vanquis to transfer the account lawfully, via deed of assignment, though they ignored me. I was on a call with a manager at Lowell Financial. While I was explaining what the law says about data handling and deed of assignment, the line dropped. When I called back, a call handler refused to reconnect me to the manager and demanded my date of birth, which I do not provide to third parties. He then accused me of sounding like a “freeman on the land conspiracy theorist.” When I asked what that meant, he refused to explain and still wouldn’t transfer me before disconnecting the call. Once I finally reached the manager again, I apologised for the delay (the company didn’t have my phone no). I didn’t complain, I simply asked whether he knew what “freeman on the land conspiracy theorist” meant? 🤭 The manager apologised for the experience and said he would monitor the call and discipline the handler if necessary. 😄 He also offered to request that my case be closed based on the information I gave him, though he couldn’t guarantee that Lowell Portfolio would agree - so we’ll see. Lowell sent a £25 cheque as an apology for the poor call handling. 👏Staying polite clearly paid off for me!