If we are assuming specifically ghosted, probably the decision on whether to work with them or not. If a client lacks the maturity to clearly communicate what went wrong and why they wish to leave, then they are not the kind of person I would want to work with. The issue is that ghosting is so common in this space. Most people will do it. Which is probably why I attract very few clients. This leads moreso to a conversation on whether it’s even worth working in this space. If someone can work with these people, and accept getting ghosted by them, then that’s great, but I cannot.

The death of any naive hopes that this would be the slingshot that would kickstart my agency. I personally wanted it really bad and defined my existence by it, which is extremely unhealthy, so when I couldn't even get results for this one person out of thousands who had refused to trust me, it was heartbreaking. He obviously wasn't happy, and I had to accept the fact that I was back to square one. So wanting something bad enough isn't enough. You have to be at peace with failure.

Creative Drive link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_BRc_tpo29qyjk7MDR-44gTyXlNvyXyTeguRnqbGnsA/edit?usp=sharing Should be interesting to see where they can improve.

Thanks for sharing it with us. Certainly going to use this when I need to.

@Emmett McCarry True, something is better than nothing. But there are more factors to consider than work ethic. If less will achieve the same result, what's the point of doing more? Will doing both have such a more significant margin than messaging alone? What percentage difference is there? "Split test everything" that's the idea, but the purpose of this post is to alleviate that requirement by asking if people have already done so and have anything to say. Thanks for the advice.

@Will Ralfe Thanks for the information. Are there leads who have not responded to text messages, but went on to pick up phone calls and were sold by the client?