Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Men of Action: Forum
5.1k members • $5/m
32 contributions to Men of Action: Forum
Aug 11 •
Question on high-status events invite
Clarification on Step 3 (Identify High-Status Events): If someone replies “yes” to my invite but I can’t attend and have no connection to the host, what’s the best move to keep credibility and still get “credit” for the invite? Should I pass their IG to the organizer and frame it as pending host approval, pivot them to an event I can actually facilitate, send public details and follow up, or take a completely different approach? I’m outside the U.S. with no promoter or venue contacts, so I’m looking for the most effective way to handle this scenario internationally.
0 likes • Aug 12
@Matthew Brixey Thanks so much, this is very valuable!
0 likes • Aug 12
@Robert Cossey Thanks!
Aug 11 •
Remember This...
Action is Essential. None of your PLANS matter None of your IDEAS matter None of your STRATEGIES matter None of your WORDS matter IF YOU DON'T EXECUTE.
3 likes • Aug 11
https://strangestloop.io/essays/things-that-arent-doing-the-thing A favorite of Chris Williamson
Aug 5 •
Is Kevin Samuels right about prostitutes?
I had this question reading some other comments on this forum today: is Kevin Samuels right about prostitution? I know that Michael has said specifically not to use prostitutes, so there is a tension between Kevin Samuels <-----> Michael Sartain. My question is, is either right/wrong or is it somewhere in the middle? Possibilities: 1. Never hire a prostitute 2. Men should hire a prostitute if they are virgins by X age. 3. Men should hire a prostitute to "scratch the itch". 4. Pay for sex, because no matter what, you're always paying. (Michael says this is bad as it can lead to sex addiction and inability to relate to women outside of money.) What do you all think? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F4OD7gpROGA
Poll
37 members have voted
1 like • Aug 11
Personally I’m in the “never hire” camp. Paying for it shortcuts the very skills and experiences you actually need to build to succeed with women long-term. It’s a temporary patch that can create dependency, distort expectations, and kill your motivation to improve. If the goal is genuine connection and social proof, this is the opposite direction. It can be also bad for: - Reputation (if done for social proof) - you don't want words spreading about you paying for women in photos - You can get scammed - here's a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFsMMIieXH4
Aug 9 •
Competence vs Status
Looking at the IG examples I've been noticing there's a lot of status being expressed but not many pictures of competence. It's this due to the fact it just isn't what people are looking for or is it that it's hard to look good or wear nice cloths doing construction or home renovation?
1 like • Aug 11
I think that raw “work” shots don’t land, but visually appealing skills like playing an instrument, dancing, cooking, or sports could. Feels like those could quickly convey competence on IG if shot well and ideally in a social or high-status setting. adding an example I recently saw: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNF8q2vNpHu/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Aug 9 •
News Interview Photos on IG?
Being interviewed for my movie on several news stations. Wasn't able to have someone take high-quality photos. What is the general thought around posting TV interviews on Insta? Yay or nay?
2 likes • Aug 11
That looks cool but maybe use it for highlights if its a personal IG account and not a business one.
1-10 of 32
