Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

InnerDevelopment@Work

460 members • Free

81 contributions to InnerDevelopment@Work
Let's discuss the real value of the THINKING dimension for organizations
Hi everyone I invite you to join me next week on Tuesday, 6pm CET, for another 30-minute discussion about what's come up so far in our reverse-engineering Client Value Challenge for the THINKING dimension. If you haven't had a chance yet to contribute your thoughts on what the concrete outcomes of the IDGs are for organizations (their pain points), then I invite you to have a look at 👉 this post and add your contribution to 👉 this Google Doc And if you can, join the conversation next Tuesday, at 6pm CET 🦋 Have a wonderful weekend Sarah (and Nadene) P.S. If you're just joining us: what we're co-creating is the language we need to speak in order to get the attention and to be understood by our clients. We need to pick them up where they're at, and therefore we are reverse-engineering the IDG language into 'organizational pain-point' language.
Let's discuss the real value of the THINKING dimension for organizations
1 like • 5d
@Nadene Canning concerns are maybe not the right place to apply most of one's thinking. Yes we need to give it enough of attention, but one should better know where he/she is heading to, rather than what to avoid, how to handle, why or why not... all those questions that arise out of concerns. But most importantly, thinking may require more searching for, than answering.
"What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make." - Jane Goodall
Dear friends, I received this message from a member of a regeneration collective I'm part. As an IDG community committed to inner development for outer change, - what do situations like these awaken in you? - where / how do you feel called to respond in your highest potential? - what difference can we make as a global, online community? ——— For those in California, I’d like to share this for awareness and the desire to find a way to get through to them and coordinate a transformation to it The Coyote Creek agrivoltaic ranch project in Sacramento county was recently permitted despite major backlash from community and local natives - apparently over 150 ppl showed up for comment to a Board meeting that lasted 7 hours “The solar arrays, combined with a 100-megawatt battery storage system, are expected to provide power for roughly 44,000 homes and operate for about 35 years — at the cost of removing up to 3,500 native and blue oak trees. (Old growth forests). The crux of the issue is “not solar or no solar,” but “environmentally destructive solar or responsible solar.”” https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article312972193.html#storylink=cpy https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRbDhKxEUq1/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2022010271/3
1 like • 5d
Are we here seeing the manifestations of human ideas when they separate long-term thinking from short-term thinking?
Why the SDGs Are Stuck — and Why the IDGs Might Be the Missing Structural Lever
I don’t know about you but whenever I talk about IDGs, I often get « why focus on individuals when it’s corporations and government who holds the real power to bring change? ». It inspired me to write the following article. Let me know if you think it will help you in future discussions and/or whether you think an important argument is missing! https://nathalievenis.substack.com/p/why-the-sdgs-are-stuck-and-why-the?r=54pxeh
0 likes • 5d
Are we not here looking at the same, but deciding that one view is more dominant ?... Like when one says you are right, but i am righteous!
Client Value Challenge: 2nd dimension: THINKING
ok, let's continue our reverse-engineering challenge with the 2nd dimension: Thinking. 👉 Here is the Google Doc to add your reflections about the real client outcome for the IDG skills under the 'Thinking' dimension If we can get some first insights before Tuesdays hangout, we can discuss them again next Tuesday, 12.30pm
Client Value Challenge: 2nd dimension: THINKING
2 likes • 16d
Kindly consider: It may be important not only to consider thinking as the product of thinking, which is thoughts... not only as the process of thinking , which would be thinking about thinking... but also as the activity of thinking, which would require the gymnastics of being aware enough of the flow, without interrupting it.
Client Value Challenge: Kicking off with the 1st dimension: BEING
Hello community! today is the day we're kicking off the 5-dimension reverse-engineering challenge to help us all get better at communicating the tangible value and worth of the IDGs. One question we always hear is ‘’How can I convince my clients to work with the IDGs?’ But the real question to ask is ‘How do I create an offering that translates the IDGs into concrete outcomes my clients care about? Over the next few week's we’ll explore together how to embody the IDGs in a way that translates into clear, tangible outcomes your clients recognize and are willing to pay for. Together we learn how to identify and articulate your clients’ external (what they say they need), internal (what they feel), and philosophical (what they believe) challenges and reverse Engineer IDG skills into Employee’s Needs, Organizational Pain Points and relative SDG Goals. Please watch the attached video and then pick one of the BEING skills and share your reverse-engineered thoughts in this Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zLUjTaSr9l8l1CI_3s7EF1KaHi3OeSLBVlL6JRpbYts/edit?usp=sharing As soon as we have some insights, we'll discuss further in one of the next Hangouts. We look forward to co-create this IDG language with you Sarah & Nadene P.S. please post questions, reflections, things that are not clear in the comments
Client Value Challenge: Kicking off with the 1st dimension: BEING
0 likes • 23d
@Sarah Santacroce what is the link between inner-compass and no buy-in?
1 like • 20d
@Sarah Santacroce thanks for this precision. If I understand... you are talking about employees inner compass, and I am talking about the leader's one. For me , to get employees buy-in, a leader has to address his own ability to let himself be guided by his own inner compass... maybe we could refer to our own experience when we were in a role of leading.... and also refer to when we were in a role of following.
1-10 of 81
Marvin Maneve
5
234points to level up
@marvin-maneve-3069
As an engaged idealistic, I love my family, human beings, life and our planet earth. Facilitator in corporate agencies, I actively conduct research.

Active 2d ago
Joined Oct 13, 2024
ENTJ
Albion Mauritius
Powered by