Hey everyone — quick question for those already selling AI receptionists consistently. Do my current pricing points seem too high, or are they reasonable? I’m considering dropping to around $897/month but want to make sure I can still comfortably cover costs while getting clients. For context, my closers get 10% on deals they close, and my cold callers get 10% if they booked the call that closes + $25 per booked call. Would really appreciate any honest feedback 🙏

I’m currently building in the AI automation space, specifically focused on an arbitrage model, and I’m looking for a serious accountability partner. Someone who: - Is actively trying to make money in this space (not just learning) - Wants to stay consistent and disciplined - Is open to sharing ideas, challenges, and wins - Is willing to brainstorm solutions and push each other forward The goal is to actually build, execute, and grow together. We can: - Check in regularly (daily/weekly) - Share what’s working and what’s not - Help each other solve business problems - Keep each other accountable to real progress If you’re in the same position and serious about making this work, reach out. Let’s build.

Can someone please explain why I should use Cowork/ Code rather then Replit/Loveable/Base44? don’t see how, I’ve built several tools with Replit and to amazing detail. My concern with coworker is it’s only lives on my machine. How are other people gonna use it whereas with Replit they have a hosted website they can go to to use it.

I have a friend who recently started a web development/digital marketing agency. They help businesses get a website and customers through it. And they have some clients who want AI receptionists, but they're still new to the business world, so they were chatting with me to try to figure out what kind of partnership we should have. Initially, I brought up a referral-type system as being the easiest because I would handle the client relationship, and they wouldn't have to think about it, and I would just pay them for the referral. But they said they want to handle selling the AI receptionist and scoping the project, and they just want me to do the back-end work. What kind of experiences have you guys had with partnerships? And how have you guys figured out the best way to price things so each person gets a fair cut?

COMMUNITY REVIEW REQUEST AI Contractor Agreement — Redacted for Privacy I just landed my biggest client — a 19-location franchise — and they sent me a fully drafted Master Services Agreement tonight with their signature already on it. Before I sign I want experienced eyes on a few clauses that concern me. Here are the specific items I'm pushing back on and why. The full redacted contract follows below. ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ THE THREE ITEMS IN QUESTION ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ITEM 1 — NON-COMPETE (Section 6.4) STATUS: Pushing back — too broad ───────────────────────────────────────────────── WHAT IT SAYS: For 24 months after the engagement ends, I cannot provide AI consulting, development, or implementation services to any business in the quick lube, oil change, or automotive preventive maintenance industry — in any state where the client currently operates or plans to operate. WHY IT'S A PROBLEM: - 24 months is a long time in a fast-moving industry - The automotive services space is one of my core target verticals - "Any state where they plan to operate" is vague — they're expanding, so this could cover more and more states over time - It's not just their direct competitors — it's the entire industry category MY PROPOSED COUNTER: Reduce to 12 months. Limit to direct quick lube and oil change competitors actively operating in the same specific markets as the client at the time of termination — not the entire industry across all states. QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY: - Is 12 months reasonable for this type of engagement? - Is market-specific language standard or will they push back hard? - Have any of you successfully negotiated non-competes down in service agreements? ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ITEM 2 — NO-REPLICATION CLAUSE (Section 6.5) STATUS: Pushing back — scope too wide ───────────────────────────────────────────────── WHAT IT SAYS: