Cerebrolysin for better brain function — has anyone tested it, and what are the recommended dosages and protocols?

Every industry has defining moments the ones that separate hype from principle and reveal who’s truly here for the long game. This is one of those moments for ours, and I want to be completely transparent about where we stand. Biomed Industries is the company credited with discovering Bioglutide (NA-931) and developing it as a next-generation GLP-based compound. Our raw materials came from the same supplier Biomed reportedly uses. Recently, serious accusations have surfaced against Biomed claims of fraudulent data, lack of publicly verifiable sequence information, and the absence of a disclosed CAS number or molecular structure. The accuser has raised valid scientific concerns that deserve to be addressed. At the same time, these allegations are new, and Biomed has not yet had the opportunity to publicly respond. That’s why we are pausing not panicking. Even in moments like this, our safeguards remain strong. We can fully document purity through HPLC and LC-MS, confirm sterility and endotoxin levels, and provide verified Certificates of Analysis. However, without a public reference structure or sequence, no lab including ours can confirm 100% molecular identity. We can verify that a compound is clean, sterile, and potent, but we can’t compare it to a molecule that’s never been fully published. To give some context, CB4211 is a great example of how innovation often moves faster than public documentation. This compound, developed for mitochondrial health and metabolic optimization, has been prescribed by physicians and compounded by pharmacies despite its structure, sequence, and CAS never being publicly released. That doesn’t make it ineffective or illegitimate it simply illustrates that, just like Bioglutide, the available data can only go so far. In both cases, these products are sourced, tested, and manufactured to the highest standards, with thorough purity and safety testing but without full structural transparency. That means identity and uniqueness are established through trust, testing, and outcomes rather than public disclosure. For all we know, CB4211 could be a more advanced form or reformulated analog of MOTS-c—or perhaps just a more expensive version under a new label. Until formal sequencing or patent releases are made public, no one can say for sure. This doesn’t discredit its value; it simply reminds us that in early-stage biotech, certainty often trails behind discovery. That’s why rigorous testing, ethical sourcing, and open communication about what is known and what isn’t are so vital.

In the latest DDT Method podcast with @Anthony Castore , Anthony discussed NAD supplementation. What I found interesting is that Anthony seemed to be against NAD supplementation via NAD+ and its precursors if I understood correctly, and a more appropriate approach would be to instead use a combination of 5 amino and 1MNA. He suggested using 5 amino pre workout and 1MNA on rest days in the evening. Anthony - would you be able to expand on your thoughts regarding NAD supplementation given it seems like a given in the longevity community that you supplement with NAD+ (injection or IV) or its precursors (NMN, NR).

This post is more for awareness and curious to hear @Anthony Castore thoughts. It seems like higher dosed SLU is now being promoted. Where the typical dosage is 100mcg-1mg, dosages in the range of 100-400mg are now being promoted. I believe BLL is planning on releasing a 100mg per capsule product. Maybe it is just me, but I can't see this ending well where you are effectively increasing the dosage 100-400 fold. Maybe the price will keep people away (I dont know what the price will be, but gotta imagine it will be very lofty), but there are enough "if some is good more must be better" people out there that I have a feeling someone is going to jump into this without slowly titrating up from much lower dosages to assess tolerance. I don't know if I am being too pessimistic here given my experience of just mixing low dose SLU with BAM sent me into a tailspin, so who knows what 100mg alone or combined with other agents will do. Curious for those folks here, what is the highest dosage SLU you have run (for me its 1.5mg)?

Has anyone heard about this peptide before? Sounds promising as it’s orally active. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70056