Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
195 contributions to Freight Skool Group
WHO should be liable
Have been messaging with @jasonputney who has shared a great perspective on liability with carrier vetting. Jason, all the points you make are very valid. We can relate back to who should be liable for securing a shipment, the shipper or the carrier? This should be assigned to the shipper as they know their product. Driver does state they need reworked and shipper is upset. In the case of vetting carriers, broker represents the carrier they select. The challenge still sits with FMCSA/DOT not being able to vet carriers prior to giving them a MC#, then 92% are unrated for safety. In that case should the FEDS not have to take more ownership for putting the bad actors in position to commit fraud. The below anyone can google/AI Shippers held liable in nuclear transportation verdict The recent legal precedents, including the significant 'nuclear verdict' against C.H. Robinson, highlight the growing liability risks shippers face when failing to properly verify motor carriers. Courts are increasingly scrutinizing the reasonableness of a shipper's decision to release freight to unverified entities. The transportation and logistics industry is currently grappling with a shift in legal accountability, particularly concerning the relationship between shippers, brokers, and motor carriers. The case involving C.H. Robinson and the carrier Lupus Superior demonstrates that juries are no longer accepting this as a complete defense. Despite the carrier holding a satisfactory FMCSA grade, the jury’s decision suggests that relying solely on federal classifications may be insufficient in the face of catastrophic accidents. We cannot rely on the FMCSA to provide data on carriers, read the last line again. With that statement, who do brokers and shippers rely on? How can either vet a carrier if FMCSA cannot prove they are legally allowed on the road in the first place. Unless the FEDS and FMCSA can stop the issuing of MC#s to bad actors, ensure carriers they allow to operate are safe, will be challenging times ahead.
FreightIQ AI Agent
I created this GPT for International Trade related questions. I hope it helps you! https://chatgpt.com/g/g-690fa083bfa88191ac325d764befb2c6-freightiq
1 like • 21d
@Kenneth Carter III free time with SSLs does vary slightly. One common they all have is 3 days free in terminal. The standard free out of terminal is 3 days. We do buy additional free days to avoid demurrage and storage charges outside of terminal. The free days from the SSL, pre-pulls are far less than demurrage from SSL and storage from rail lines.
1 like • 19d
@Kenneth Carter III we buy the free days from the SSLs. If we have an overseas partner they will purchase the free days. One customer cannot receive the volume based on DC congestion, we buy 10 days, prior to challenges that allowed SSLs to increase we paid $500 USD. Now they vary by market and SSL & capacity
Looking for Drayage First Brokers
We’re on a mission to help drayage brokers secure freight without cold calling or long hours prospecting. As an ex broker I understand that the industry has it wrong. You shouldn’t have to be good at sales to perform well. There’s sales and there’s operations. Stop combining them because the industry has been doing so.
0 likes • 23d
@Kenneth Carter III in our case we are a people first company. TMS, WMS, EDI, AI are all tools they use. Our teams still develop the relationships with carriers which are our partners and customers. All good brokerages have 2 customers, shipper and carrier. Tech can dampen these relationships.
1 like • 21d
@Kenneth Carter III sorry for the delay in response. Our operations do not sell in the traditional sense. Their sales are to carriers, the objections they face are price, they do need to overcome the number 1 objective in every industry "what is your price". They also work as relationship developers with the carrier partners. They are very different, sales sells to shipping customers, operations sells to supporting customers. Companies that lose site of the fact both are customers will struggle IMHO
Close only counts in horseshoes
We came so close to Canada and the US finalizing a trade deal. Unlike horseshoes close does not count or help either countries economy. The below was pasted by a US economist, this was to show the real trade advantage the US had. Politicians who are to represent "We the People" on both side of the border are certainly not doing this IMO. Canada politicians stated POTUS is taxing his own people. CDN government after break down are now taxing Canadians as they implement tariffs. Unless both governments get back to the table, make a deal for the people, we the people will pay the price. Thoughts? The US would actually be a surplus If you remove fuel and hydro from trade between Canada and the US, the trade deficit for the US would actually be a surplus. In 2023, the US recorded a trade deficit of $36 billion with Canada, but when you exclude energy exports, the surplus is approximately $85 billion. This indicates that the US has a significant advantage in the trade relationship, particularly in services, which has a surplus with Canada.
0 likes • Sep 18
@Lisa Taylor , with the current leaders there is NO telling what is next. Since tariffs have been introduced there is no consistency, no real direction other then consumers pay more for everything. If the tariffs had been implemented to increase jobs or reduce the deficit, clearly that does not work as all have learned. Many Canadians still wonder what we did to Trump to have him take this approach. Reality many countries are asking the same question. Not a fan of Doug Ford, hate the fact he used tax payers $$ to take out an ad to piss off Trump more, stupid move while trying to make a deal. The one message I did agree with, President Regan did have the USA lead global trade, this resulted in America having the highest number of billionaires, 800 which is double the next country, they accomplished this as they understood, America represents 25% of all consumer goods purchased, these smart Americans used the World Trade established and led by Regan. In the interim we are now dealing with tariffs in Canada our politicians stated they would not do. North America is stronger together, USA. Mexico and Canada, need the politicians in the US and Canada to figure this out.
Excerpt from the Cargo Van class on Dispatchers
If you go online into forums on Facebook, Reddit, X etc it would have you believe it is the Dispatchers that have the freight. Dispatchers are the only way to get freight for your cargo van. This is not True! Dispatchers perform a legitimate and important job in Freight Transportation but they are not licensed or regulated by Federal laws like Freight Brokers are. Carrier Dispatchers look at load boards (loads posted by brokers) and try and negotiate rates with freight brokers on your behalf to keep your cargo van moving. Dispatchers work for the carrier! A Dispatcher works for you Not the other way around.
2 likes • Aug 31
the dispatch services do insist they have the freight. They are not brokers, they are to only work for carrier as @Steven Tittle explained. The challenge is many operate like a broker using another carrier MC# hole other host of challenges
1-10 of 195
Bill Robinson
6
1,223 points to level up
@bill-robinson-4594
24 year transportation specialist

Active 7d ago
Joined Feb 2, 2024
Ontario, Canada
Powered by