Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Atlassian Everything

230 members • Free

Conscious Business Accelerator

11.4k members • Free

2 contributions to Atlassian Everything
Jira Workflow/Scheme Configurations for larger scale orgs
Hey everyone! As I was brushing my teeth this morning (which is usually the time I'm most reflective), I wondered how other orgs that you guys work in or have consulted with like to manage your workflows and schemes? I've worked in both a very disciplined and totally chaotic environments, and really see how essential it is to have consistency across teams. In the past, we have leveraged that by having a single scheme and workflow across multiple spaces (and with some minor exceptions for non tech teams kept a like for like mirror image of those items with some minor adjustments based on their individual team needs) But on the flip-side, if you need to put mandatory fields or validations on workflows to improve the discipline of some teams but not others, would you feel that having several duplicate schemes works best in these regards? Or do you just apply a one size fits all approach and stick with one single instance?
0 likes • 2d
In my former org we've started out with dev/engineering having different workflows and work types. We've ended up standardizing our workflows across dev/engineering because it enabled consistent reporting and kpis across these projects. If you have different workflows for systems that do same type of work, you have to measure these differently and then run into challenge of reconciling or comparing stats. We've also ended up standardizing most screens, because it reduced errors and learning curve for developers who worked on multiple projects or moved between teams.
Jira vs. ClickUp/Asana/awork...
I am curious if anyone of you has worked intensively with other PM tools, besides Jira, and is able to compare them. Its been a while since I used Asana and ClickUp. Are there any specific limitations that exist compared to Jira?
3 likes • 8d
I've worked with Asana, ClickUp and Azure Devops. Migrated all three to Jira also. Azure DevOps is less visually appealing and has the sterile sharepoint feel to it. It's also focused on DevOps, so it's not as versatile for non-sdlc related workflows. Teams who are locked into Microsoft ecosystem might use this because it's an easy choice within an existing portfolio. Asana's appeal is that it is simple. It has a very clean and easy to learn interface. Non-technical teams love it. Its very easy to spin up projects and a lot of teams end up using Asana as a task list. You can get fancy with automations, custom fields, integrations and the like, but it is nowhere as robust as Jira. Teams work in isolation in their projects, so it doesn't require the type of governance you normally want in Jira, because your changes are project-level. Asana is quite expensive for what it is, but it has a good reputation in the marketplace. Click Up is more Jira-esque and is appealing to both technical and non-technical teams, although I believe devs still lean towards tools like GitLab, ADO or Jira. Click-up might be a good solution if you have a mixed bag of teams and are cost-conscious. It feels more complicated than Asana, but I feel it can do more also. Between these tools I'd say Jira is the most feature rich with the widest marketplace app library. Atlassian also built a platform where Jira integrates well with other options like Confluence, JSM, Bitbucket and others. Microsoft's Azure DevOps is the closest to that, although I'd say the way Jira-JSM-Confluence-Loom flow together feels more cohesive than Azure/Power Suite.
1-2 of 2
Artem Taranenko
1
2points to level up
@artem-taranenko-1614
Seasoned software implementation professional passionate about the Atlassian platform. For contact reach me at info@quaysidedigital.co

Active 10h ago
Joined Jan 13, 2026
Powered by