@Kay Kabwe Splitting tools always creates silos and complexity you have to manage. You can do it for sure, but then you have to find a way to make it work without creating a mess. Normally there is no perfect solution for everybody, so someone has to make a compromise. I would argue that Jira actually can provide very good executive level insights, if you use top-level planning spaces + Jira plans. Top level wants to understand what is going on, without going too much into details. Normally I would solve this by having a space for executive level that contains only initiatives. Then you have multiple spaces that contain everything from epic to sub-task (or however you call your work items). Then you link initiatives to epics. The teams that do the work have their own space and are able to customize it to an extend. C-level have their own space as well, only containing high level initiatives, but IF they want to see how things are going - they can. Because they can check the progress of the linked epics, tasks, sub-tasks. This is the main strength of Jira from my pov.