User
Write something
Pinned
3 things I do every weekend to set up my week
I’ve learned this the hard way. If you wait until Monday to get focused, you’re already behind. Here’s how I set up my week before it starts: 1. I choose ONE win that mattersNot a to-do list. Not busy work. One outcome that actually moves my life or business forward. That goes on the calendar first. 2. I remove friction ahead of time I look at my week and ask,“What’s going to trip me up?” Too many meetings, distractions, low-energy days. I fix it now so I’m not relying on willpower later. 3. I reset my environment Desk clear. Calendar clean. Priorities visible. When Monday hits, I don’t want to think... I want to execute. This isn’t about discipline. It’s about design. Winning weeks are built before they begin. What about you? What’s the ONE thing you do to set yourself up to win the week ahead? Drop it below 👇
Pinned
🔁 How Micro-Adaptations Build Long-Term AI Fluency
One of the most persistent myths about AI fluency is that it requires big changes. New systems, redesigned workflows, or dramatic shifts in how we work. This belief quietly stalls progress because it makes adoption feel heavier than it needs to be. In reality, long-term fluency with AI is almost always built through small, consistent adjustments rather than sweeping transformations. ------------- Context: Why We Overestimate the Size of Change ------------- When people think about becoming “good” with AI, they often imagine a future version of themselves who works completely differently. Their days look restructured. Their tools look unfamiliar. Their thinking feels more advanced. That imagined gap can feel intimidating enough to delay action altogether. In organizations, this shows up as waiting for perfect systems. Teams postpone experimentation until tools are approved, policies are finalized, or training programs are complete. While these steps matter, they often create the impression that meaningful progress only happens after a major rollout. At an individual level, the same pattern appears. We wait for uninterrupted time, for clarity, for confidence. We assume that if we cannot change everything, it is not worth changing anything. As a result, adoption stalls before it begins. Micro-adaptations challenge this assumption. They suggest that fluency does not come from overhaul. It comes from accumulation. ------------- Insight 1: Fluency Is Built Through Repetition, Not Intensity ------------- Fluency with AI looks impressive from the outside, but its foundations are remarkably ordinary. It is built through repeated exposure to similar tasks, similar decisions, and similar patterns of interaction. Small, repeated uses allow us to notice how AI responds to our inputs over time. We begin to see what stays consistent and what varies. This pattern recognition is what turns novelty into intuition. Intense bursts of experimentation can feel productive, but they often fade quickly. Without repetition, learning remains shallow. Micro-adaptations, by contrast, embed learning into everyday work where it has a chance to stick.
🔁 How Micro-Adaptations Build Long-Term AI Fluency
Hi
I'm Marion and I am a Real Estate Agent. I'm an Ai newbie and am looking forward to learning many new skills to improve my everyday experiences in work to gain more time to enjoy the simple things in life. Looking forward to learning with you all :-)
Bombarding Alignmeant Interferes
A Respectful Awareness on Upscaling That Can Unconsciously Recreate Scarcity Much Gratitude for the Affirmation that I am on the right track seen as one of the few so close to Life Changing Impact, Fore, Clients and Myself. That kind of Recognition can be Future Fuel Frequency. It can also be Our Mirror. Because here’s the Awareness I can’t ignore: Bombarding Alignmeant Interferes. When a person finally takes a chance, especially someone under-resourced, even homeless, even rebuilding from the ground up and the price keeps rising as the “next step,” it can feel like the ladder keeps extending upward only after they start climbing. That doesn’t just test CommitMeant. It tests Dignity in Destiny. It quietly tells people, “You can begin, but you may not belong unless you can pay more.” This is where the “same-same for gain” shows up, unconsciously. Dean, Tony and many are known for coming from hardship into Leadership unleashed. That origin story is part of why so many people trust the once poor, now Prosperous Success. But when the pathway becomes a sequence of escalations, hundreds turning into thousands, “affordable entry” becoming repeated upsells, something subtle but substantial can happen: the program can start resembling the very scarcity system it claims to help people overcome. Not because anyone is evil. But because revenue logic can override human logic if it’s not intentionally governed. It is what it is, Until We Make it is, what it Should Be. I want to say this with Grace, not accusation:If a person’s transformation is real, it shouldn’t become inaccessible the moment it becomes serious. Many people joined when the entry point was barely under a hundred because they were Hopeful, because they hunger their Enterprise/Nichency unleashed, because they Believed their enterprise could finally become their exit from debt and despair. Some are operating off public library Wi-Fi. Some are living in survival mode but choosing Faith anyway. That is not “low value.” That is high courage. That is WholeSummedSelfWorth in motion.
1
0
Bombarding Alignmeant Interferes
🤝 From Control to Collaboration: What Letting AI In Really Requires of Us
One of the quiet myths around AI adoption is that success comes from staying firmly in control. That if we just give the right instructions, apply enough structure, and reduce uncertainty, AI will behave exactly as we want. In reality, the opposite is often true. The biggest breakthroughs with AI tend to happen not when we tighten control, but when we learn how to collaborate. ------------- Context: Why Control Feels So Important ------------- Most of us were trained in environments where competence was measured by precision. Clear plans, predictable outputs, and repeatable processes were signs of professionalism. Control was not just a preference, it was part of our identity. If we could define every step and anticipate every outcome, we were doing our job well. AI disrupts this deeply ingrained model. It does not behave like traditional software. It responds probabilistically, offers interpretations rather than guarantees, and sometimes produces outputs that are surprising, imperfect, or simply different than expected. For many people, this creates discomfort before it creates value. That discomfort often shows up as over-structuring. We try to lock AI into rigid instructions. We aim for the perfect prompt. We narrow the interaction so tightly that there is no room for exploration. On the surface, this looks like responsible use. Underneath, it is often an attempt to preserve a sense of control in unfamiliar territory. The challenge is that excessive control quietly limits what AI can contribute. It turns a potentially collaborative system into a transactional one. We ask, it answers, and the interaction ends. What we lose in that exchange is insight, perspective, and the chance to think differently than we would on our own. ------------- Insight 1: Control Is Often a Comfort Strategy ------------- When we encounter uncertainty, control feels stabilizing. It gives us the sense that we are managing risk and protecting quality. With AI, this instinct is understandable. We worry about errors, misalignment, or appearing unskilled if the output is not perfect.
🤝 From Control to Collaboration: What Letting AI In Really Requires of Us
1-30 of 10,865
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by