🧠 What Anthropic’s Week Reveals About the Real AI Race

(And why discipline matters more than hype)

While OpenAI restructures, Anthropic is having a very different kind of week.

They announced a $200M partnership with Snowflake and quietly prepared for a potential $300B IPO, bringing in Wilson Sonsini; the powerhouse firm behind Google and LinkedIn’s listings.

But what caught my attention wasn’t the money.

It was Dario Amodei’s warning.

He openly said some AI companies are “yoloing” their spending; overextended, overconfident, and betting aggressively on future revenue that may or may not materialise.

Anthropic, by contrast, is preparing for multiple scenarios, not just the most optimistic one.

📈 The Growth Is Extraordinary But So Are the Risks

Anthropic’s reported revenue trajectory is staggering:

$0 → $100M in 2023
$100M → $1B in 2024
Projected $8–10B by the end of 2025

At the same time, there’s a 1–2 year lag in data-centre build-outs.

That means:

The decisions being made today lock in costs, constraints, and risks for years ahead.

This is where things get interesting — and uncomfortable.

💰 Why This Actually Matters

AI is not just a technology race. It’s a capital allocation race.

Leaders are making multi-billion-dollar bets before the market has stabilised:

on compute
on infrastructure
on enterprise adoption
on regulatory outcomes

Some of those bets will define the next decade. Others won’t survive it.

The companies that last won’t just be the most ambitious; they’ll be the most disciplined.

🧭 What This Means for Organisations Using AI

For businesses, educators, consultants, and leaders integrating AI right now, this is a powerful reminder:

Not all AI partners are building sustainably
Not all growth stories are stable foundations
Hype can mask fragility
Discipline is a strategy

Choosing AI tools, platforms, or partners isn’t just a feature decision anymore — it’s a risk and resilience decision.

🌱 Why This Matters to SHE IS AI

At SHE IS AI, we’ve never positioned AI as a gold rush, a quick win or a “move fast and break things” game.

We care about long-term thinking, ethical, responsible adoption, human-centred leadership,

systems that endure, not just scale.

Anthropic’s approach; preparing for multiple futures instead of betting on one; aligns far more closely with how we believe AI should be developed and adopted.

This moment reinforces why we focus on clarity over noise, strategy over speed and people over hype.

💬 As AI continues to move at this pace, what signals do you look for to assess whether an AI company is building sustainably? How do you balance innovation with discipline in your own work?

Curious to hear your thoughts 👇

(With credit and thanks to Nici Sweaney for the original insight and inspiration behind this reflection.)

1 comment