20 Muslim countries object Israel recognition of Somaliland as voices rising along suggestions such as moving the gazans to the new African country. The objection of the uma did not eco as loud as the Israeli recognition, as Somaliland citizens lit up they're city squares with the iconic Zionist blue and white decorations and lights. Will the gazans have a new home? Will Somaliland become Israel's cuba in the war against yeman? Well... None can really tell, but israel's involvement and investment in africa show's that the little Jewish country is on it agin! While war tare Africa israel is taking a stand with the more "democratic" factor on the board and the Muslim brotherhood smells trouble.

I see some anti-religion sentiment here. Religion can be and has been many things. To say all religion is evil, to me, misses a central point: mankind needs a Transcendent ideal, something beyond ourselves to give us meaning and purpose. Excise that, we have a vacuum in our souls which will be filled, one way or another. The atheistic, materialist surrogates are, however, arguably far worse. Nietzsche was a good diagnostician, but the idea that we would reach Humanity 2.0 by filling that void with our own self-constructed values was dead wrong. In a way, we can't run away from religion, and these "religions" (like Marxism) have a dreadful track record. I don't think it's too far a reach to say that religion is inevitable. The West secularized itself, in part because of a kind of collective PTSD. In doing so, it created a nihilistic, materialistic, listless populace. Anxiety and depression are through the roof. But even more telling is a simple fact: it seems more and more clear that materialist, secularized society loses the will to replicate itself. Birthrates are below replacement, sometimes way below (witness South Korea). So, someone can rail against religion, but cut out religion, a society will craft surrogates and also drift towards self-oblivion. It will commit suicide, implode. In other words, you can't have the elements that make a culture vibrant, which make a culture flourish, without religion (broadly understood). It's like a lobotomy. The idea might be to excise antisocial behavior, but you also render the person a dull vegetable, a husk.

The massacre at the Bondi Hanukkah celebration was not an anomaly. It was the mathematical result of allowing Islamic extremism to dominate Sydney. For two years, the public square was surrendered to those chanting for the destruction of a people. We were told these were peaceful marches for "Palestinians" and that diversity was our strength. This was a lie. When you allow an ideology of conquest to take root, you do not get a multicultural debate. You get a war zone. The father and son who opened fire were merely the physical manifestation of the slogans we allowed to echo unanswered. We fed the beast of radicalism in the name of tolerance. As an Iranian, I recognize this specific Trojan horse: they use the Western language of "freedom" to install a regime that abolishes it. Now we are being devoured by it. The price of this cowardice is extinction.

Here is the recording of our latest session. A national identity constructed entirely upon the negation of another people cannot be reformed. It can only be dissolved. This was the central, hypothesis driving our latest daily session. The room dissected the concept of the "Two-State Solution" not as a moral aspiration, but as a mechanical failure. The collective argued that the "Palestinian" identity is not a standard nationalistic movement. It is a specific political construct manufactured by the Muslim Brotherhood and sustained by UNRWA to serve as a perpetual battering ram against the Jewish State. The group posited that as long as this identity exists, the desire to retake "from the river to the sea" will remain the primary operating system of the culture. Friction emerged regarding the timeline of a solution. Samantha argued for a strategy of indefinite containment, suggesting that Israel must maintain military occupation for centuries if necessary, waiting for a theoretical "deradicalization" before granting autonomy. She represents the lingering hope that time creates new variables. Others argued that if an identity is rooted in the conquest of Tel Aviv and the erasure of 1948 borders, time does not heal. It festers. The discussion pivoted to historical precedents of population transfer, citing the shifting borders of Poland and the partition of India. The consensus suggests that the West has treated this conflict as a unique anomaly when it should be treated as a standard historical correction. We are left with a stark choice. We can continue the diplomatic fiction that two opposing vectors can occupy the same space, or we can acknowledge that peace requires the total defeat of the revanchist narrative. This is not an echo chamber. It is a testing ground where ideas like indefinite containment clash with arguments for total dissolution. Bring your perspective to the table and sharpen your understanding of the West’s most critical conflicts. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar