@Rick BTCMiner First, two corrections before anything else. You built your whole argument on a definition that doesn't appear in the Torah. "A descendant of Abraham who follows God's will" isn't the criterion for being a Jew. The Torah is far more specific than you think. The covenant was promised to Abraham's seed (Genesis 17:7). Then it narrowed. Isaac, not Ishmael (Genesis 17:19). Then Jacob, not Esau. The 12 tribes came from Jacob. Then at Sinai those 12 tribes received the Torah together and became one nation, the people of Israel. God states it as a fact, not a condition: "For you are a holy people to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be His own personal treasure, out of all the peoples on the face of the earth" (Deuteronomy 7:6). I translated this myself, the word "segulah" doesn't translate cleanly into English. The question isn't who descends from Abraham. Esau did. Ishmael did. The question is who's in the covenant. The covenant has a clear chain. Abraham, then Isaac (not Ishmael), then Jacob (not Esau), then the 12 tribes that came from Jacob, then the nation that formed at Sinai. That's the line. Anyone outside that line isn't part of it, no matter how righteous. So a Jew is one of two things. Either you descend from that line, or you join it the way Ruth did. By binding yourself to the people, the Torah, and the covenant. Jethro believed in God. Melchizedek believed in God. Neither was a Jew. The criterion isn't even believing in the right God. It's covenant membership in a specific people. Second, redefining "Israel" to make it so the original Israelis get cut off, and anyone can join through a new criterion isn't grafting. It's a takeover. Now let me say something real. Yours was the most serious response in this whole thread. I see it came from a real place. I'm writing back from the same place. Here's what I want you to sit with. You're asking me to accept a book that says the Torah is true while contradicting it. Calls the eternal covenant "obsolete." Cancels laws the Torah itself calls eternal. Does that pattern sound familiar?

@Greg Penta I've written many other things in this post. If you want more info on my position, it's all right here. If you ask me to, I'll condense it and lay out all my new claims for you right here, so you don't have to go digging through this thread.

Thank you for teaching me the term "vocal fry"

@Al Eis It can be annoying

@Shauna Starcher Me too

@Johan J My website is on Vercel, not my audio file. I uploaded the song directly from my computer as a wav. Do you know the safest place to host a website?

@Johan J Just wanted to thank you for raising the security concern — it actually pushed me to make this thing more legit. I bought a proper domain and I also made my GitHub repo public so anyone can inspect the code and see exactly what the site does. Full transparency. 🌐 New site: https://www.torah-worldwide.com 💻Source code: https://github.com/TorahWorldWide/TorahWorldwide Appreciate you looking out for the community 🙏 (and thanks for the compliment on the website)

@Lior Mtl I want to add somthing: I judge the doctrine, not the people. Most Muslims are decent human beings. But a moderate generation doesn't make the text/ideology moderate. The violent verses are still there, waiting for whoever takes them seriously. And when the radicals act on those verses, the moderate majority stays silent. The grass doesn't need to act like the snake. It just needs to look the other way. Great analogy 👍

@B T Agreed