https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LiDitgV9STw?feature=share Here is a beautiful women who converted to Islam without even fully studying it. Let's debunk her shall we. She believed that Islam is overly strict. However, no rule in Islam is unique; attitudes toward modesty, dietary restrictions, and sexual norms are present in all religions. Therefore, Islam isn't particularly special in terms of strictness. Ultimately, she admits to feeling peer pressure, as her close friend was a Muslim from Qatar. During a visit to Qatar, she appreciated the culture (which is much inferior than Western Culture) and felt beautiful in an abaya, which led her to convert to Islam. Some might view this as a betrayal of Western civilization. While Muslims may welcome her conversion, they can be quick to criticize a Muslim who adopts Western attire or leaves the faith, showcasing hypocrisy. She questions why showing skin is commonplace in Australia. This highlights cultural differences; many societies historically embraced revealing clothing without it implying anything significant. It indicates that Australians generally don’t judge others based on attire. I wonder how revealing clothes would be treated in Qatar. Why does that country impose clothing restrictions on women? Isn’t Australia a more progressive and rational choice since it doesn’t enforce such rules? Furthermore, claims about Quranic science, like embryology, have been challenged numerous times. The embryological insights in the Quran are merely reflections of 7th-century knowledge and lack uniqueness. Many conversions to Islam in the West stem from a disconnection from one's own culture due to extreme individualism, weak family ties, absence of state support, lack of conservative roots, and a tendency toward excessive openness, which some may see as self-destructive. Rise up Westerners and Non-Muslims, Debunk their conversion stories. Converts to Islam especially the ones who are beautiful and rich gets funding from Qatar and many oil rich Muslim nations and appreciation from a huge Muslim audience.

https://x.com/marionawfal/status/2001811094399267196?s=46 UNDERCOVER VIDEO: 17 OUT OF 35 SAN FRANCISCO STATE STUDENTS OFFERED CASH TO "KILL JEWS" WHEN ASKED An undercover filmmaker visited San Francisco State University in 2023 posing as a fundraiser seeking money to attack Jewish "soft targets" worldwide, including cafes, synagogues, hospitals, schools, and buses. His pitch was explicit: "We want to fund operations against soft targets. Schools, hospitals, Jewish cafes, Jewish schools, Jewish buses, synagogues... Attack, blow things up." Out of 35 students approached, 28 expressed support. 17 offered cash on the spot, ranging from $5 to $30. "I don't really have a job right now, so I would do like maybe twenty dollars." "I like what you're saying. I would love to help. Do you want us to spread the word too?" "Peace and love." Peace and love... while donating to blow up synagogues. The filmmaker's conclusion: "The rhetoric and demonizing Jews we have seen globally has led to this. Nearly fifty percent of people I spoke with offered me money to kill Jews." This was before October 7. Before the campus encampments. Before "from the river to the sea" became a mainstream chant. They told us campus antisemitism wasn't real. The video says otherwise. Source: @AmiHorowitz

Here is the recording of our latest session. The West did not stumble into prosperity by accident, nor was its success a function of mere biology. The discussion opened with a visceral look at the intellectual decay of our modern discourse. The room observed that the term "white" has become a clumsy, often weaponized shorthand for something far more significant: the Enlightenment inheritance. We noted that the Left relies on this racial monolith to erase the specific cultural histories of the Irish, the Scots, the Italians, and the Russians. By collapsing these distinct identities into a single category, they create a convenient target for collective guilt. Friction emerged when the conversation turned to the utility of pride. The collective argued that being proud of an immutable characteristic is logically thin, yet the room recognized a tactical necessity. When a culture is told to be ashamed of its existence, "pride" becomes a refusal to submit to a lie. We observed that the Enlightenment: the very system that invented equality under the law and the abolition of slavery: is being dismantled by the same people who claim to champion justice. The room concluded that the British Empire was not the villain of the historical record, but its most transformative actor. It was the only power to voluntarily turn its back on the slave trade and use its global reach to enforce that liberation on others. To apologize for this legacy is not an act of virtue: it is an act of historical illiteracy. We are living in the ruins of a serious culture, where the facts of our progress are being traded for the comforts of victimhood. We operate a space for those who prefer the cold light of reality to the warmth of a crowd. Our daily calls are dedicated to the preservation of Western intellectual sovereignty. You are invited to join the conversation and defend the principles of the Enlightenment. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar