What topics do you suggest we discuss in our next group discussion?

Here is the recording of our latest group discussion. The hardest test for any liberty movement is determining when tolerance becomes a weakness. Our latest daily session confronted this specific dilemma. We are a group dedicated to liberty. Yet we were forced to debate whether the West is allowing its own principles to be weaponized by its enemies. The discussion was heated and exposed a critical fault line in how we apply our values to reality. One faction of the room held the absolute libertarian line. They argued that "sunlight is the best disinfectant" and that censorship is always a mistake. Their stance was clear. If you ban hateful ideologies like radical Islamism or Communism, you do not destroy them. You only force them underground where they grow stronger. We argued that a free society needs to see the enemy clearly in order to defeat it in the open. The opposing view challenged this as naive. This side argued that we are not fighting a fair fight. We are facing billions of hostile actors and state-sponsored bot farms that flood our networks with propaganda. They warned that maintaining "absolute" free speech in the face of enemies who want to destroy us is not liberty. It is suicide. The debate moved toward a crucial distinction regarding the "Non-Aggression Principle." We discussed where speech crosses the line into violence. The conclusion was not that we should abandon liberty. The conclusion was that we must define exactly where our tolerance ends so we do not become the architects of our own destruction. Our daily sessions are not passive lectures. They are active strategy councils where we sharpen our arguments against the threats facing Western civilization. You need to be on the line to understand the true gravity of what is coming. Check the calendar to find the next scheduled session: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar

The Maccabees revolt is an amazing story about jewish warrirors and gods helping hand in battle, but what about the oil miracle? As a consensus people believe this miracle actually happend. But in fact the oil miracle is not mentioned in the original source texts, its rather a later addition 600 years later. the events themselves are documented in the Books of the Maccabees (2nd century BCE) and in Josephus (1st century CE) — with no mention of the miracle of the oil. The story of the miracle appears only in the Babylonian Talmud, about 600 years after the events, and it does not even appear in the Jerusalem Talmud. Everyone can choose how to interpret that. I know this sucks jews... but we have enough real and amazing stories to tell. We need to cut off the lies. Am Israel hai