Debunking Islamic Falsehood Claims · Liberty Politics Discussion

Debunking Islamic Falsehood Claims

I watched a video claiming Islam is the final, uncorrupted truth, and I’m going to refute its main arguments one by one with actual evidence, highlighting how Islam's claims crumble under scrutiny.

Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l75X-Dkw78E

And here is my refutation one by one:

🔸Adam & Eve Is Just Another Protoplast Myth – Evolution Proves It

The Adam-and-Eve story is a classic ancient Near-Eastern creation myth, not history—borrowed from Mesopotamian tales like Enki molding humans from clay. Every river-valley culture had a “first couple” tale because pre-scientific people couldn’t explain human origins. Hindu Manu and Shatarupa belong to an entirely different cyclical cosmology with manvantaras spanning eons. Modern genetics is decisive: mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome studies show modern humans descend from an African population of at least 10,000 individuals ~200,000 years ago — not a single couple 6,000 years ago. There is zero evidence of a genetic bottleneck to two people ever, exposing Islam's literalism as scientifically bankrupt.

🔸If God Knew Humans Would Stray, Why Not Send Only the Quran from Day One?

An all-knowing, all-powerful God sending multiple scriptures He already knows will be corrupted is logically incoherent and reeks of divine mismanagement. Why the multi-stage plan full of predictable failures, if Allah is truly omniscient? It makes Islam's progressive revelation look like a flawed human invention rather than perfect divine wisdom.

🔸Earliest Human Religion Was Animism, Not Monotheism

Anthropological consensus (Göbekli Tepe, Upper Paleolithic art, phylogenetic studies) confirms the first religion was animism and nature worship—attributing spirits to rocks, animals, and stars. Strict monotheism only appears thousands of years later, undermining Islam's claim that tawhid is humanity's innate, original faith. This suggests Islam retrofits history to fit its narrative.

🔸Why 124,000 Prophets? Just Send the Final One First

If God is omniscient, He could have sent Muhammad to the very first humans and skipped the entire chain of supposed distortion. Islam's endless parade of prophets feels like narrative padding, not divine efficiency—critically, it raises questions about why an omnipotent deity would tolerate millennia of "failed" revelations.

🔸Angels as Messengers Are a Zoroastrian Borrow – God Doesn’t Need Middlemen

The entire angelology (Gabriel, winged beings, revelation via Jibril) comes straight from Persian Zoroastrian yazatas and Sraosha after the Babylonian exile, adopted wholesale into Judaism and then Islam. An omnipotent deity has no need for celestial couriers—direct inspiration or telepathy would suffice. Angels feel like a very human literary device, exposing Islam's borrowings as cultural syncretism rather than pure revelation.

🔸Almost No Ancient Religion Preached Strict Monotheism

Judaism only became strictly monotheistic after 500 BCE, post-exile. Christianity turned it into a Trinity (Nicene Creed 325 CE). Zoroastrianism is dualistic (Ahura Mazda vs. Angra Mainyu). Your “everyone originally said God is One” claim is historically false and ignores how Islam cherry-picks to claim primacy.

🔸Allah Is Not the Same as Vedic Brahman or Sikh Waheguru

Quranic Allah is a strictly transcendent, personal lawgiver with anthropomorphic traits (like "hands" in metaphorical senses). Upanishadic Brahman is impersonal, pantheistic/panentheistic (“neti neti”—not this, not that). Sikh Waheguru is formless (nirankar) with no angels, no prophetic seal, no hellfire judgment day — completely different concepts. This highlights Islam's God as a localized Arabian construct, not universal truth.

🔸Hinduism Never Banned Idol Worship – It Explicitly Allows It

Bhagavad Gita 12:5 says worshipping the unmanifest is hard, so murti puja is a valid path for connecting finite minds to the infinite. Even the Arya Samaj shows you can be fully Vedic and strictly monotheistic at the same time, debunking Islam's blanket condemnation of idolatry as ignorant cultural bias.

🔸Noah’s Flood Is a Local Mesopotamian River Myth

The exact same story (ark, animals, birds released) appears centuries earlier in the Epic of Gilgamesh and Atrahasis, rooted in real Tigris-Euphrates floods around 2900 BCE. No global flood layer exists in geology or genetics, making Islam's Noah tale a plagiarized legend, not divine history.

🔸Muhammad Praised Moses & Jesus for Political & Conversion Reasons

He needed Jewish tribes and Christians in Arabia to accept him. Early Medinan suras and the Constitution of Medina prove he expected them to convert. Denouncing their prophets would have ended his mission instantly—critically, this strategic flattery reveals Muhammad as a shrewd politician, not just a pure prophet.

🔸No Evidence the Torah or Gospel Were Corrupted

Dead Sea Scrolls, Septuagint, and thousands of early New Testament manuscripts show remarkable textual stability. The Islamic “tahreef” claim is polemical propaganda, not supported by neutral scholarship (see Bart Ehrman, Bruce Metzger, Emanuel Tov). It seems like a convenient excuse for why other faiths don't match Islam.

🔸If God Knew Earlier Books Would Be Altered, Why Send Them At All?

That just makes God look like He enjoys setting up systems designed to fail, a theodical nightmare that Islam dodges with circular logic.

🔸The Trinity Verse 1 John 5:7 Is a Proven Late Addition

The Johannine Comma is missing from every early Greek manuscript and only appears in late Latin copies. Textual critics have known this for centuries—yet Islam fixates on it as "proof" of corruption, ignoring how the Trinity stands on other verses.

🔸The Vedas Show No Sign of Corruption

Meticulous oral transmission and surviving shakhas prove the Vedas are among the most stable texts in human history, far outpacing the Quran's human-preserved variants.

🔸The Quran Is Preserved by Human Effort, Not Observable Divine Intervention

Huffaz and Uthmanic codex = intensive human work, with qira'at differences in pronunciation and wording. Human preservation ≠ proof of divine origin—it's just good memorization, not a miracle.

🔸Every “Scientific Miracle” in the Quran Has Been Debunked

Embryology follows Galen, cosmology is 7th-century flat-earth vibes, alleged Big Bang verses are vague poetry and ancient cosmology. Historians of science and actual scientists have dismantled these claims decades ago, showing Islam's "miracles" as desperate modern reinterpretations.

🔸Islam Clearly Evolved from Hanif Monotheism & Non-Trinitarian Christianity

Pre-Islamic hanifs, Ebionite-like groups, Jewish tribes, and Arabian culture all fed directly into what became Islam. It did not appear in a vacuum—critically, this syncretism undermines claims of it being the pristine, unaltered final word.

Your video presents Islam as the obvious final truth. When you actually look at the historical, archaeological, genetic, and logical evidence, the picture is very, very different—Islam looks more like a 7th-century Arabian remix of older ideas than divine perfection.

20 comments