User
Write something
New Member Onboarding. is happening in 43 hours
Pinned
Ai before ChatGPT: The Interview.
In this interview I sit down with Matt from NLP Logix. He's been working in the AI space longer than most people have been working in general. We dive into what changed and what is it going to be important about the future. This is a three part series, I will be posting another two videos from another two experts in mathematics and Engineering! Please like and comment on YouTube if you have time as well!
Pinned
Welcome to Clief Notes. Here's where to start.
1. Go check out 📚Navigating The Course to see how to get around and what's here. 2. Start with The Foundation. Concepts, folder architecture, prompting framework. Everything else builds on this. 3. Check in at the bottom of each lesson. Polls, discussion posts, other members working through the same stuff. Use them. 4. When you're ready to build real things join in on our Biweekly competitions and win some real cash. ⭐ Competitions Mega Thread 5. If you are wanting to dive into the masterminds, grab all the past templates, artifacts and resources. Upgrade and head into the The Vault for Premium and The Drawing Room (VIP) for VIP 6. Post your work. Ask questions. Help others when you can. What are you here to build?
Pinned
📣 New: one onboarding session, every week
I want to meet new members earlier, not months after you join. Right now a lot of people join the paid tiers and figure things out on their own. That's slower for you and it means I don't get to know you until you've already won a competition or posted in the Vault a few times. Further our Afternoon and High Tea calls 🫖 High Tea 9: The Graph the first bit of each call has been ALOT of intros and I think that eats away valuable time (not that getting to know you is not valuable) that members who have been around for a while look forward to during our live sessions. So starting this week, every new VIP and Premium member gets a standing invite to a short session with me and the mods. Calendar · Clief Notes 🕑 Wednesdays, 2pm 🎯 Open to new VIP and Premium members We'll cover: 🔑 Getting into Discord 🧭 Finding your way around 🤝 Getting the most out of other members 🏆 How to win the competitions ❓ Quick questions at the end (and feedback on what you really want out of value and such, helps me decicde if I need to add or change anything in the community) 30 minutes. One goal: you walk out knowing the community and I know your name.
The missing layer behind better AI writing?
Everyone wants AI to “sound like me.” So they keep fixing outputs one prompt at a time. More warm. More direct. Less corporate. More founder voice. But the model is guessing because the real *source layer* is missing. A simple fix: Separate Identity from Voice. Your identity profile tells the systm who or what must not be distorted: principles, judgment patterns, boundaries, points of view, public-use limits. Your voice profile tells the system how that identity behaves in language: tone, pacing, examples, vocabulary, anti-patterns, channel shifts. - Identity is not copy... - Voice is not strategy... - One draft is not the source of truth. First dfine what must stay true, then define how it should sound. lastly, generate the post, email, page, script, or deliverable. If you define *identity* and *voice* separately, you stop prompting for tone every time and start building a reusable writing system. Curious how others in Clief Notes are handling this: Do you define identity and voice separately, or do you keep them in one brand/persona file?
Rule of thumb on how many words?
Hi everyone. Is there any rule of thumb on how many words in every layer of an ICM workflow? Im trying to narrow it down in a large repo with many canonical things that apply for every workflow and I have 1263 words in layer 0 and a context routing of 871 words.
1-30 of 2,312
Clief Notes
skool.com/cliefnotes
What we give away free beats most paid courses. Build durable AI systems with a Marine vet and Edinburgh researcher. 40+ lessons, growing.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by