Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
Clief Notes
54.8k
5.0
Free
390 contributions to Clief Notes
Should I Reverse my own rule on dashboards for my ICM?
Found a piece of my own client work this week that had been sitting stalled for thirteen days. Fully drafted. Ready to go. It was stuck because one handoff step never happened, and nothing caught it until I stumbled on it by accident. Around the same time, I'd been asking clients a blunt question: what are you actually paying me for? AI can build the website, write the ads, draft the campaign now. Three separate conversations, no coaching between them, same answer: assurance. They're not marketers. They don't know what's happening day to day. They want to know someone trustworthy is watching it. So the plan was to automate proof. AI reads the data, drops five plain bullets into the agenda instead of a generic monthly PDF. Here's what we did. Here's why. Then I looked at why nobody caught the stalled one. I never had a name for "stuck because someone outside the loop hasn't gotten back to me" as its own thing, separate from normal waiting. Both just read as "waiting." If you can't tell the two apart, nothing will flag the difference until you trip over it by accident. If the product is "I'll make sure it's handled right," the proof of that can't be an AI summary nobody double-checks. An unchecked summary just hides the same invisible-work problem one layer deeper. When part of your process depends on a real person outside your system getting back to you, how do you tell "still waiting, that's normal" from "quietly stuck," before you stumble into it by accident? Who's actually watching for that, if you're honest? I had been disciplined about not building a UI for my ICM because I thought it was a waste of time. But now I feel like I need a dashboard for KPIs and statuses so I know what's actually going on under the hood. Anyone else running into this? And by ICM I mean my Operating System or Second Brain.
Should I Reverse my own rule on dashboards for my ICM?
1 like • 16d
You can either do it by thinking through your states and getting a really good query (scripted, tested, don’t let it be created fresh each time) that is surfacing that OR a good view over it. I, personally, have both. Use the query most of the time - but check the view when housekeeping is required. Depends how your brain works… and on the volume and complexity…
A rival could copy the system you paid for. Has it met your numbers?
Nothing I'm about to say here, Jake hasn't already said to you in his own words. You just agreed to pay for a tool, an agency build, or an AI strategy deck described as proprietary, custom, or built specifically for you. Or maybe you're spending time and money in tokens to build it yourself. Before that invoice clears, ask what you actually bought/built. In 1999, the record industry was selling a file. Napster made that file free to copy. The industry's first move was legal, not commercial: the RIAA sued that December, an injunction landed in March 2001, Napster shut itself down that July, and by June 2002 it had filed for bankruptcy. Two and a half years, mostly lawyers, and the file had already gotten away. Software is having the same year right now. In October 2026, Kotaku's Lewis Parker reported on old games, including Halo: Combat Evolved and Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, running in browsers after being pulled apart and rebuilt from the files that ship to players. Parker called it "IP protection whack-a-mole on a scale I don't think we've seen since the advent of pirated DVDs." That's 1999 again: a technology outran what rights holders could control, fast. The limit this time: it works on what ships to a customer's machine. It doesn't reach a company's own servers. https://kotaku.com/we-might-be-cooked-as-these-vibe-coded-web-browser-ports-of-halo-the-simpsons-hit-and-run-and-gta-vice-city-seem-to-work-perfectly-2000743300 Napster duplicated the recording. This makes it cheaper to reconstruct software from what has already been distributed. The techniques and legal questions differ; the economic threat is familiar. Either way, what you paid for stops being rare once a working copy exists outside your control. In McKinsey's 2026 State of AI survey of 1,719 respondents, 32% said their organizations had decided against buying at least one software product or feature because they could build it with AI coding tools instead. That's a purchase avoided, not a subscription canceled. It isn't 32% of software spend disappearing, and it isn't a SaaS collapse. More than three in ten organizations are telling a researcher, in writing, that their build-or-buy answer has shifted.
A rival could copy the system you paid for. Has it met your numbers?
1 like • 16d
@Curtis Hays and… just in case anyone doesn’t get my humour because I haven’t been around here for a while… I have a saying I like to use “if you’re always the smartest person in the room, you should find some better rooms”. I know enough to know there are plenty of smart people here that I have learnt a lot from. About things that matter more than ICM. And it’s a massive compliment from someone whose opinion means a lot. Ngā mihi, Curtis. ❤️
1 like • 16d
@Aurel Babiš I’d recommend a re-read. Sure you guard it - but take a look at what Curtis suggests happens when someone pirates it rather than developing it… It’s a matter of time until it becomes obsolete.
Congratulations Jake
Just wanted to drop a congratulations note to you and your family @Jake Van Clief on the birth of your baby. Wishing you and your family a happy, rested first few weeks. From myself and I know everyone here.
Congratulations Jake
1 like • 19d
Congratulations!!! ❤️
Synthetic Voice Poll
If you opened this post, you might already have a very strong opinion about it. Let's be honest, it is practically every where (and I know I resort to it often). I was going to write a different post all together, when it occurred to me that it sure serves a section of humanity who has lost their voice, and who want to put content out. I wrote an opinion about it - https://thequietai.com/writing/say-whats-synthetic.html Though a poll is far more fun -
Poll
11 members have voted
1 like • 30d
@Gabriel Azoulay two. Usually get about halfway through, have an error, start from a bit before that point and record from there to the end. Splice the two together. That has been true for all the videos I shared on here. Always two for those, very small overlap.
1 like • 30d
@Arne-Per Heurberg no, not at all. I thought you got me, just thought there might be others following along that hadn’t thought through these things, so it was worth spelling it out! :)
1-10 of 390
Mira Bradshaw
7
5,346 points to level up
@mira-bradshaw-7707
Data tech and product leader. Experience leading data science and data governance.

Active 4h ago
Joined Jul 27, 2026
Powered by