Anelia Sutton

Write something

Pinned

Sep 2 •

Welcome to the Community on Skool.com. I’m so glad you’re here. This isn’t just another group. It’s the beginning of your legal journey. I am Dr. Anelia Sutton. I was betrayed, broken, and underestimated by the court system. But I rose from the ashes of injustice to rewrite the future. Now, I’m here to share what I’ve learned so you can stand tall, crush corruption, and win with confidence. 👋 DIVE INTO THE TABS - Community: create a new post to share info, not just ask questions - Classroom: free classes and even schedule one-on-one strategy sessions with me - Calendar: our schedule of live events 👋 DO’s and DONT’s - Do NOT ask any questions on this post - Do NOT send private messages to me - Do NOT DM me or tag me - Do NOT seek support for MPU courses here - Do NOT hijack someone’s post or comment with your own issue - Do share legal research, not just ask questions - Do say hello on this post - Do ‘like’ this post and all posts as a thank you - Do say how you found this community - Do enroll in the free classes (Classroom tab) - Do post then pack your patience - Do review this post often for updates 👋 FYI - There’s a post dedicated to Family Court, Child Support and Traffic Court - Most questions have answers in the Classroom Together, we’re building more than a community, we’re rising as everyday heroes who crush corruption and stand tall with confidence. I’m so glad you’re here. Let’s rise together. With strength, Anelia

Pinned

Sep 5 •

Let me be clear on what this space is about. This is a community, not a customer service line. Community means we ALL contribute for the good of ALL. If you are here, it’s because you have value to add: your experiences, your lessons, your wins, even your struggles and frustrations. Share it as a new post. What you share could be the very thing that saves someone else going through the same battle right now. You don’t have to know everything to contribute. Start by sharing where you are. Post your personal experiences. Not just a bunch of questions. You have been through a lot, so share it. Post what happened before, during, and your current circumstances. We need the journey, not just the panic. That is literally how my own journey into legal research began. I have over 4,000 videos across social platforms teaching empowerment through legal education. I've done the work already so it's not happening here. The reason I started this community is to learn about your journey. Share it, so others can grow. And just maybe your journey will prevent someone else from suffering. And if I played a role in your journey, great, that's fantastic. The point is I can't stand lurkers who don't contribute. Just asking a bunch of questions like we caused your pain. We didn't, so don't bring that Facebook group mentality here. Either way, if you're here, and you want to stay here, you need to engage on ALL posts by liking and commenting to encourage people to share more. And read the Welcome post daily for critical updates. This is all hands on deck. Pull your weight or you will get kicked to the curb. If you're here to lurk and take by only asking questions without ever posting, sharing, or giving back, and you remain at Level 1 beyond two weeks, you're outta here, you will be removed. I am strict, so I'm monitoring for engagement of all Level 1 members. 👏 Quick Summary 1. Read the Welcome post daily 2. Like and comment on all posts 3. Level 1 members: Do NOT post questions 4. Lurkers who stay at Level 1 will be removed 5. No entitlement, no selfishness, no exceptions

Pinned

Sep 2 •

The system is rigged to keep us small, silent, and afraid. But fear dies the moment you learn the rules they use against you. Legal education isn’t just knowledge, it’s a weapon. And when we wield it together, we’re unstoppable. This community was built to ignite that fire inside you. To share the scripts, the wins, and the wisdom that flips the courtroom upside down. Remember our rally cries: 1️⃣ When we rise, corruption falls. 2️⃣ We ride at dawn—warriors for justice. 3️⃣ No fear. No silence. Only victory. 4️⃣ Together we win. Now is the time to rise. Share your questions. Share your wins. Step into your power. The revolution starts with us. ⚡ Anelia

New comment 24d ago

Jimmie Sample

2d •

General discussion

How do you "take back" consent?

Like when you go to court on a criminal case and the only reason they really had jurisdiction is because you didn't know any better and plead not guilty... How do you cancel that unknowning agreement made(after a suspended imposition of sentence that came from a plea deal you made while you were under duress & we're intoxicated when you made it)? Is that possible?

New comment 2d ago

Dr. Anelia Sutton

17d •

General discussion

🔎 Detrimental Reliance: What It Means & How to Use It Against Corrupt Judges

Detrimental reliance happens when you rely on someone in authority to act fairly and follow the rules — and you get harmed because they didn’t. In law, it means: 👉 You reasonably believed the judge (or authority) would behave according to law, fairness, and due process… 👉 You relied on that belief during your case… 👉 And because the judge violated those standards, you suffered harm, loss, or prejudice. It is rooted in equity — meaning the court must act honorably if it expects YOU to honor its rulings. 🧠 Why It Matters in Judicial Misconduct Cases Most people walk into court believing: - The judge will be neutral - The judge will follow procedure - The judge will listen to evidence - The judge will not insult, bully, or shame them That expectation is reasonable. Judges swear an oath to do exactly that. So when a judge behaves like a wayward, rude, biased, or hostile authority figure, you can argue: “I relied on the court’s duty of fairness and that reliance led to harm because the judge abandoned neutrality.” This is detrimental reliance. ⚖️ How to Use Detrimental Reliance in Your Case...You can raise detrimental reliance in: 1. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Point out that you relied on the judge’s oath and legal duty to conduct themselves with fairness and impartiality — and that the misconduct caused: - Loss of rights - Skewed rulings - Financial harm - Reputation damage - Emotional/psychological injury - Procedural injustice 2. Motions to Vacate or Reconsider Show that the entire ruling is tainted because you relied on a “fair tribunal” that didn’t exist. A biased judge = constitutional defect. 3. Appeals Appeals LOVE this argument.Judges cannot violate your reliance on fundamental fairness. If they do, the ruling is often reversible error. 4. Civil Rights Lawsuits (42 USC § 1983) If the misconduct rises to a constitutional violation, detrimental reliance strengthens your argument that: - You expected due process - You were denied due process - You suffered actual harm because of that denial

New comment 4d ago