Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

RECLAIM & REIGN INSTITUTE

3.2k members • Free

Anelia Sutton

182 members • Free

14 contributions to Anelia Sutton
Under criminal investigation, attempted forced sale of home
I just got a call from my ex-wife’s attorney’s office informing me of an incoming ex parte to force the sale of my home. Let’s see how this plays out, I’m prepared to have the judge, her attorney, and clerk arrested for crimes committed in open court. I let them slide on day 1 of 3 of their attempted biased divorce and custody trial. Next time I won’t be so gracious. If the bailiff refuses to make the arrest, they too, will be pulled into tax court for prosecution.
1 like • 11d
Eric- I am praying for you. It is heartbreaking to hear what you are going through! I left CA because of how fraudulent the courts are. My business partner is a retired federal judge and he is hearing rumors of the Admiralty/Maritime law courts possibly being returned back to Common Law. In that case only 2 questions would be relevant to your case. Who is the injured party? Or what damage to property occurred? Unfortunately, divorce is like a forced bankruptcy by the courts (liquidation of assets). When you sign a marriage certificate, you are married to the state and your children are property of the state.
2 likes • 6d
Eric- Get copies of oaths taken for the judge. Compare that oath to the required language the oath should contain. NO oath? The position on the bench is vacant. The judge can't rule on your case. Force them to recuse themselves from the case. I cant remember the form number of the form they are supposed to submit regarding asset disclosure (form 500 or 700) many dont disclose properties etc.. grounds for recusal as well. Run a Dunn and Bradstreet report on the court your case is in. You will find it is owned by a private corporation. I used to live in Orange County CA and most of the courts in that area are owned by a retired judge. Courts don't administer justice but instead operate as banks. The judge is a banker and the court clerk is the teller. Get the CUSIP # tied to your case. Then look up the 3 bonds in the CRIS system. JP Morgan the investment bank securitizes. Ask the judge why you are being trafficked on the open market? BOOM!
The truth about corruption
Today, court isn’t about justice, it’s about control. And the one thing they fear most is exposure. I’ve seen cases end in 7 days and others drag for 7 years. The difference? How much they fear you shining a light on their corruption. They silence the uninformed, but they can’t silence the educated. Because once you know your rights you become unstoppable. Yes, it can be an uphill battle, and it's easy. But, hang in there to see it through. Don't give. Because it's going to be worth in the end. They have the numbers. But we have the truth. Soon, we will have the numbers too. And when we do, it's over for them.
The truth about corruption
2 likes • Oct 25
Always show up to court by special appearance. Always start with the challenging jurisdiction first. The burden of proof is one them to prove jurisdiction. It that doesn't work, try to force the judge to recuse themselves over lack of oath, or a deficient oath. No oath the bench is vacant and so is their position, they cant hear the case. You could also request a copy of Judges in the United States are required to file a financial disclosure report using Form AO 10 or Form AO 10T when appointed, as mandated by Title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, and further modified by the Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act (CETA). sometimes they leave off the form real estate and ownership in companies they have an interest in. Sometimes, they leave off the form' real estate 'and' ownership in companies' where they have an interest
1 like • 11d
Jimmie- EVERYTHING is about jurisdiction. who has control over you? I am most familiar with California law. But I believe this may apply: Yes, jurisdiction can be challenged if an order to revoke probation is issued, particularly if the court lacks authority to act after the probation period has expired. In North Carolina, for example, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to revoke probation if it attempts to do so after the probation term has ended, unless a prior order extending probation was properly made and provided notice to the defendant. If a court revokes probation after purporting to extend the probation period beyond its original end date without proper notice or a valid extension order, the defendant may raise a jurisdictional argument on appeal. The court must have retained jurisdiction under the law, and any revocation must follow the procedural requirements established by statute and rule. In federal law, the court may revoke probation and impose any sentence that could have been initially imposed if a violation is found, but this authority is subject to the court's jurisdiction and proper procedural safeguards. Therefore, a jurisdictional challenge is a valid legal argument when the court acts beyond its authority, such as revoking probation after the term has expired or without proper procedural foundation.
Ai response to employer notice to cease garnishments
What’re y’alls thoughts on what Ai is stating about this? “You cannot have your employer stop child support garnishment directly; you must obtain a court order to end it. The process involves filing a motion with the court that issued the original order, providing evidence to support the termination, and serving the new order on your employer. Common reasons for termination include a child reaching the age of emancipation (usually 18, but can be up to 19 if they are still in high school), a change in custody, or if the debt has been paid in full.”
0 likes • 11d
Eric- If ANY of your property is stolen from you. Contact ATF. The IRS has NO enforcement authority under Title 26. Instead they use unwitting 3rd parties like banks and HR folks at employers that don't have a background in tax code. The IRS was created by Congress and no enforcement authority was granted to the IRS. All they can do I try to scare you with their letter-writing campaigns. It is the ATF under Title 27 that is being used illegally. A NOTICE from any party is just a notice and subject to enforcement with being adjudicated by a judge. Child support garnishments, bank account levys and wage garnishments fall under: 26 IRC 6331. Levy and distraint. (a) Authority of Secretary. (Section (a) has been eliminated from the notice of levy sent from you). (Here in part) …Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or Elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d) of such officer, employee, or elected official. The IRS may levy the wages of officers, employees or government officials because their wages are already in the possession of the government, therefore, seizure is perfected. The Notice of Seizure is therefore provided on the wages, which are already in possession, and the levy is perfected. This section (a) has been omitted from the backside of your copy of the Notice of Levy. This can be very misleading as addressed in two separate letters from two different United States Congressmen Dennis M. Hertel and E. Clay Shaw, Jr.; a copy of both letters are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as EXHIBIT D, which state to wit: “…Notice of Levy on Wages…Section 6331 IRC entitled “Levy and Distraint” And Section 6331(a) IRC entitled ‘Authority of Secretary’…does not provide Authority to levy wages of private citizens in the private sector. The Omission of this section from IRS form 668-W may be misleading to some employers…”
1 like • 11d
The IRS commits document fraud by eliminating subparagraph (a) which clearly states the levy or garnishment is only meant for a certain class of people. accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or Elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d) of such officer, employee, or elected official.
Trial removed from docket
I got the judge, my wife’s attorney, and the clerk shook yesterday. I noticed today that the case was removed from the docket, they know qui tam is coming, like within the next two weeks. I warned them this would be a career ending event. I’ve also got her attorney, the DA, and seven other judges bond’s arrested in preparation for RICO charges in U.S. Tax court. I demanded the securities, the judge denied my motion, she must’ve forgotten they’re bound by tax law, the IRS lodged their ‘25 accounting manual in every court system. What the judge did here is commit a crime in open court, withholding the securities. I told the bailiff I wanted her attorney, the judge, and the clerk arrested and stormed out. I reduced their 3 hour trial allocation to five minutes, its game over and they know it! I just told my wife’s maggot attorney they’ll at he better return my son to me while they’re in the state, or I’ll see to it he goes to federal prison, we’ll see how he responds. They FA, and now they’re about to FO, and it’s happening very fast.
1 like • Oct 27
God bless you Eric. Get your son back!!!
2 likes • Oct 27
I am considering using a Writ of Qui Tam against the IRS when I file my lawsuit. RICO, exhortation, mail fraud, wire fraud, defamation of character etc......
Court is Like a Tennis Match 🎾
Isaac Wright, Jr. was wrongfully jailed for 10 years. He studied law In prison. He proved he was innocent. Became an attorney. Sent the judge who imprisoned him to prison. He was arrested in 1989 convicted in 1991 and sentenced to life in prison for charges he didn't commit. When he was released in 1996 he had served about 7 years. After release, Issac earned a bachelor's degree in 2002 and a law degree in 2007, then passed the New Jersey bar exam on his first try, but faced a nine-year character review before admission in 2017. Issac is the first person in U.S. history to secure his own exoneration from a life sentence and then become a licensed attorney in the same jurisdiction. Here’s the thing….All court cases are similar to a tennis match, but with criminals. They are criminals, it’s what they do. So instead of focusing on criminals acting like criminals, focus on what you can control. They are criminals but they are also grownups and you can’t tell grownups what to do. Don’t worry about them. Let them manage their case and you do the same. Here’s a broad stoke on how to manage your case… Learn the rules and procedures of the court and the law of your case. That’s it. Literally. By law, the court must provide the rules and procedures of the court to everyone, either through calling their employees or visiting their website. Either way, everybody has to follow them. Remember when you were younger and you wanted to play a new game, but you had to learn the rules of the game so you’ll know how to play? And remember how some people thought they were too special to follow the rules so they would lie, cheat, and finesse? Just doing everything and anything just to win. Court is the same way. It is ran by a bunch of childish and immature people with titles doing the most. It would actually be funny if it wasn’t so harmful. Next, find the law of your case….Meaning, support your position. How? Find cases that are similar to your case that had a favorable outcome. Why? Because they’ve already done the heavy lifting. They already did the research. They have the references and laws to back it up. And if you find a Supreme Court case, that’s even better.
Court is Like a Tennis Match 🎾
3 likes • Oct 17
That is such an inspiring story and one that gives everyone hope. Education and perseverance helps to overcome the fraud of the courts. Courts are banks and court cases are financial instruments with CUSIP #'s attached to them.
1-10 of 14
Judge Judy
3
14points to level up
@judge-judy-3055
My partner is a retired federal judge. Over 30 years we provide PMAs and Private Trusts. Including an IRS recognized process to stop paying taxes.

Active 14h ago
Joined Sep 2, 2025
Powered by