On this Happy Giving Thanks Day 2025, I am grateful for Dr Anelia Sutton’s sharing, educating, supporting, and serving each community member as a willing and caring mentor here on SKOOL and elsewhere, which is allowing us to be aware, alert and able to thrive despite injustices in our nations justice system. We are each blessed. I will keep our Founder Dr Anelia and each one of our Community Teammates on my Blessings List today and beyond. 🧡🙏🏾🧡 Enjoy all the good things and see the good in all things.

Detrimental reliance happens when you rely on someone in authority to act fairly and follow the rules — and you get harmed because they didn’t. In law, it means: 👉 You reasonably believed the judge (or authority) would behave according to law, fairness, and due process… 👉 You relied on that belief during your case… 👉 And because the judge violated those standards, you suffered harm, loss, or prejudice. It is rooted in equity — meaning the court must act honorably if it expects YOU to honor its rulings. 🧠 Why It Matters in Judicial Misconduct Cases Most people walk into court believing: - The judge will be neutral - The judge will follow procedure - The judge will listen to evidence - The judge will not insult, bully, or shame them That expectation is reasonable. Judges swear an oath to do exactly that. So when a judge behaves like a wayward, rude, biased, or hostile authority figure, you can argue: “I relied on the court’s duty of fairness and that reliance led to harm because the judge abandoned neutrality.” This is detrimental reliance. ⚖️ How to Use Detrimental Reliance in Your Case...You can raise detrimental reliance in: 1. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Point out that you relied on the judge’s oath and legal duty to conduct themselves with fairness and impartiality — and that the misconduct caused: - Loss of rights - Skewed rulings - Financial harm - Reputation damage - Emotional/psychological injury - Procedural injustice 2. Motions to Vacate or Reconsider Show that the entire ruling is tainted because you relied on a “fair tribunal” that didn’t exist. A biased judge = constitutional defect. 3. Appeals Appeals LOVE this argument.Judges cannot violate your reliance on fundamental fairness. If they do, the ruling is often reversible error. 4. Civil Rights Lawsuits (42 USC § 1983) If the misconduct rises to a constitutional violation, detrimental reliance strengthens your argument that: - You expected due process - You were denied due process - You suffered actual harm because of that denial

I just got a call from my ex-wife’s attorney’s office informing me of an incoming ex parte to force the sale of my home. Let’s see how this plays out, I’m prepared to have the judge, her attorney, and clerk arrested for crimes committed in open court. I let them slide on day 1 of 3 of their attempted biased divorce and custody trial. Next time I won’t be so gracious. If the bailiff refuses to make the arrest, they too, will be pulled into tax court for prosecution.

If you think your legal trauma is special, rare, or unique... it is not. If you think I want to read a wall of words about your experience in private... I don’t. If you think I want to commiserate about legal trauma... I don’t. If you think I want fans... I don’t. What I want is an army of empowered warriors ready to heed the call when I livestream across America. Do not DM me. If you DM me... I will not respond and you will be removed from this community. If DMing continues, this community will be closed. Why? Because DMing shows you believe your case is for my private attention instead of the community’s learning. That’s unfair to everyone here. I want everyone to feel empowered enough to share publicly in our group so others can learn, grow, and be helped. Private messages do not build collective power. If you need help, post your question here without tagging me. Our members and I can offer answers, resources, and support that benefit everyone. No DMs. Fairness matters. We rise together.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcgk7LtmXqM