I just got a call from my ex-wife’s attorney’s office informing me of an incoming ex parte to force the sale of my home. Let’s see how this plays out, I’m prepared to have the judge, her attorney, and clerk arrested for crimes committed in open court. I let them slide on day 1 of 3 of their attempted biased divorce and custody trial. Next time I won’t be so gracious. If the bailiff refuses to make the arrest, they too, will be pulled into tax court for prosecution.

I got the judge, my wife’s attorney, and the clerk shook yesterday. I noticed today that the case was removed from the docket, they know qui tam is coming, like within the next two weeks. I warned them this would be a career ending event. I’ve also got her attorney, the DA, and seven other judges bond’s arrested in preparation for RICO charges in U.S. Tax court. I demanded the securities, the judge denied my motion, she must’ve forgotten they’re bound by tax law, the IRS lodged their ‘25 accounting manual in every court system. What the judge did here is commit a crime in open court, withholding the securities. I told the bailiff I wanted her attorney, the judge, and the clerk arrested and stormed out. I reduced their 3 hour trial allocation to five minutes, its game over and they know it! I just told my wife’s maggot attorney they’ll at he better return my son to me while they’re in the state, or I’ll see to it he goes to federal prison, we’ll see how he responds. They FA, and now they’re about to FO, and it’s happening very fast.

What’re y’alls thoughts on what Ai is stating about this? “You cannot have your employer stop child support garnishment directly; you must obtain a court order to end it. The process involves filing a motion with the court that issued the original order, providing evidence to support the termination, and serving the new order on your employer. Common reasons for termination include a child reaching the age of emancipation (usually 18, but can be up to 19 if they are still in high school), a change in custody, or if the debt has been paid in full.”

Sensitive information redacted. This is what I received when I hand delivered the first legal notice to California DCSS, subsequent notices will be sent certified sent received. If this department is complicit in the conspiracy and fraud, why can’t they brought onto RICO charges with the judges, clerks, and attorneys?

This woman asked me if I was a sovereign citizen, I told her to be very careful not to subject herself to a potential $100k defamation suit. Then I politely explained that the judges are actually the sov cits, that citizens claiming to be creditors without actually being creditors is who give actual creditors a bad name.