This weekend I started using Garry Tan's Claude skill called Gstack. It adds several skills to Claude Code that helps with the design and build process. Right now the one I'm using the most is /plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review The CEO Review takes a feature or change request and looks at it from multiple angles asking "Is this really what we need or do we need to expand/contract the scope to hit what the user ACTUALLY is looking for?" And it's doing a fantastic job of helping me hash out all the extra questions I forget to ask. The ENG Review takes the same approach but it looks at the gaps in the technology that are going to come up during the build and it gets resolutions for them before the build starts. Then it compiles a comprehensive plan for the agent to build out. If you have time and you aren't using it yet, give it a try. It's significantly helped with my app quality!! If you decide to try it, let me know how it goes! Here’s the link to the GitHub repository: https://github.com/garrytan/gstack

Claude Code's context window is your most valuable resource, and most people burn through it in the first 10 minutes. Here's what context window mismanagement looks like in practice: you open a session, paste in a 2,000-line file, ask Claude to "review everything," then wonder why it starts hallucinating or forgetting earlier instructions by message 15. The fix is simple but requires changing how you think about sessions. Rule 1: Scope every session to ONE task. Not "build me a full dashboard." Say "add a date filter to the existing analytics table in dashboard.tsx." Smaller scope means context lasts longer, which means better output. Rule 2: Use /clear strategically. When you switch to a new file or new feature, type /clear to reset. Don't carry baggage from 30 messages ago into the next task. Rule 3: Pin your project brief at the top of every session. A 150-word summary of what the codebase does, your stack, and what NOT to touch. This costs almost nothing in tokens but prevents Claude from re-reading 5 files just to figure out what you're building. Rule 4: Use CLAUDE.md for persistent context. Architecture decisions, naming conventions, deployment notes. Claude Code reads this automatically at session start. Anything that applies every session goes there. Rule 5: Don't paste full files unless asked. Use "see file: src/components/Button.tsx" first. Let Claude request the file when it needs it. This preserves your window for actual work. I tested this on a 3,000+ line codebase last week. Sessions that used to drift and need restarts after 20 messages now run clean for 60+ messages doing real work. What's your current context management strategy, or are you just running sessions until they break?

So, I posted a response to Jay’s comment that was removed by moderators, flagged as “be positive”. (Jay’s post: https://www.skool.com/ai-automation-insiders/openclaw-module-coming-very-soon). My comment raised substantive concerns about OpenClaw’s security posture, whether average users would know how to harden systems to use it safely, and whether premium-gating that capability aligns with the broader mission of the Skool community. Nothing in my comment targeted any individual, was abusive, or was intended as a personal attack, and it even used a smiley faced emoji. My commentary was informed by my background ans an cyber security practitioner and was presented as constructive criticism, not negativity. So, my genuine question is this; are members allowed to raise respectful but critical views about products and business decisions here, or is the expectation that commentary should only be supportive? If the former, then “be positive” is too vague to be useful moderation guidance. If the latter, that should probably be stated clearly, because those are very different community standards. More broadly, a healthy community should be able to accommodate more than praise. There is already plenty of discussion about how awesome things are, but, the reality is that substance often sits behind a paywall. For context, the moderated comment was along the lines of questioning OpenClaw’s security, the burden on average users to harden it, and whether making it premium-only was consistent with Jay’s/the community’s mission.

Now that clawdbot is out. Are people still going to be using N8N or it pretty much took over ?

what tools are you guys suggesting for AI voice on GHL? For SMS, I'm using Closebot right now. Looking for a voice option. Did a demo with Ringcloud - looked ok but i'm trying to compare and get options. trying to SMS/call ppl who don't self book.... and get them to book.