Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Ruth Performance Lab

293 members • Free

4 contributions to Ruth Performance Lab
26.3 Strategy Guide
This week = war of attrition! I've broken this workout down as throughly as possible in this week's strategy guide. Even though the movements are simple and the weights are light... there is still a LOT you can do to maximize your performance here. If you take one thing away from this guide, READ THE BURPEE / WEIGHT CHANGE STRATEGY SECTION!
2 likes • 24h
I did your strategy for the first change. I only had 1:20 for the burpees and cleans in the last bar so I did the burpees quick, both plate changes, and then held on for dear life for a set of 7 power cleans. Thanks for your help!
0 likes • 23h
@Kyle Ruth it was the most pain of this open for sure. I like all these movements so I was a bit surprised at how bad it got
26.2 Strategy Guide
Here is this week's strategy guide - this is basically just a test of RMU as you clearly saw in the demo. I've tried to give some strategy and points of performance around preserving the RMU by the end. GOOD LUCK AND LET US KNOW HOW IT GOES!
1 like • 8d
@Kyle Ruth what I think is interesting about this workout is it took me 3:15 to finish my ring muscle ups. You are much better than me and it took you nearly 3 minutes. Travis Mayer took nearly 3 minutes. Gabi Migala took a bit over 3 minutes. The females on the announcement took 2-3ish minutes. People already knew this workout was a muscle up capacity under fatigue workout, but the fact that games athletes and not even semifinals athletes (me) are getting relatively similar times on the muscle ups is kinda crazy. The difference is not that the people who are gonna be best in the world can get the muscle ups done so much more quickly or unbroken (though some will), it’s that they can put themselves under so much duress and move so quickly at other pre-fatiguing movements that and still do muscle ups while worse athletes have to go so much slower on the buy in. Getting a better score at this workout requires you to have a very large unbroken set of muscle ups, so that you can trust yourself to get trashed in part one and still fall back on a set of six or seven. Aside from obvious fact of practice doing muscle ups under pre-fatigue.
1 like • 5d
@Liana Portland I use stuff like beyond the whiteboard and open placements, quarterfinals placements, etc. to help me understand where I am against the field and see if I have a glaring weakness. It just helps to have some objective data so that my priorities aren’t just based off of things that I feel like I’m bad at. This requires a little bit of nuance because with the open and quarterfinals placements could not just be based on if your fitness level but could be from very poor execution and it’s also just a snapshot of how you did that day not your whole year of training and your whole picture of Fitness. When I look at my placements, even though I always feel like I need to get better at thrusters and chest to bar and handstand walking, etc., I see I actually need to get better at being able to pick up a heavy snatch and do wall balls (less fun)
Density Progressions: The Missing Programming Variable
Density Progressions: The Programming Variable Coaches Often Miss Most coaches spend a lot of time thinking about the relationship between volume and intensity. This makes sense because it is easy to quantify: - How much work is being done? - How heavy is it? - What paces are they holding?  But one variable that often gets overlooked is density. Density simply refers to how compressed the work is. It’s the relationship between how much work is being done and how quickly it’s being performed. Two workouts can have identical volume and similar intensity, but create completely different physiological responses depending on how dense the work is. Example: Same Volume, Very Different Density Let’s take a simple example. Workout A 200 wall balls for time Workout B 10 wall balls every minute on the minute for 20 minutes In both cases, the athlete is doing 200 wall balls. But the experience and the physiological response are completely different. In the “for time” version, the work is much more dense. Fatigue accumulates continuously. Metabolites build up. Intramuscular pressure increases. Perfusion drops. Tension under fatigue increases as the athlete tries to maintain movement speed. All of this creates a much more stressful internal physiological environment. You get: • More accumulated fatigue • Less metabolite clearance • More ischemia inside the working muscles • More tension being produced while the muscle is already fatigued That combination dramatically increases the amount of muscular damage and soreness that athletes experience. In the EMOM version, every minute includes a built-in rest period. That rest allows partial clearance of metabolites, restoration of blood flow, and recovery of force production. The volume is the same, but the density is much lower, so the physiological cost is very different. Why Density Matters in CrossFit Density becomes even more important when we consider the nature of the sport. CrossFit workouts tend to be very dense especially formats like:
Density Progressions: The Missing Programming Variable
0 likes • 10d
So I guess for planning Off season Volume accumulation emoms, potentially very low density doses with technique and perfection focus “EMOM 20 10 wallballs as relaxed as possible” Building into season Increasing the density of those doses if still using emoms, vs making the athlete take big “bites” of volume at a time Such as the examples given above In season Doing mini metcons with those movements with a rep speed focus to ensure athlete is moving at sport specific speeds. There is no point in the volume or density if the athlete is not moving at sport specific speeds “Within 4 minutes, rest to full recovery between each, x3 30 wallballs 18 box jump overs 30 wall balls 18 wall ball box step overs” In this way, you are training for CrossFit like a running race. Building volume of your running, running repeats of your race volume at probably a lower pace (density), then doing intervals shorter than your race volume at speed or preferably overspeed. The tricky thing is we have SO MANY different "races" to prepare for, and the races aren't just running.
1 like • 9d
@Kyle Ruth By starting with shorter intervals and then extending, you are also testing the ability of the athlete to maintain volume/density/preservation of rep speed and transition urgency. Makes sense!
Stim Matters: The Deadlift Deep Dive
This week @Ryne Sullivan and I dedicated the entire episode to deadlift inside of competitive CrossFit context. We covered everything from assessment --> programming for strength vs capacity --> technical issues --> and A TON more. In the episode I promised I'd provide a copy of my internal notes that I put together before the show, so I wanted to post those here for anyone who wanted them AND as a way to stimulate discussion. I'm really curious about how other coaches in the space approach "the deadlift problem" for competitors -- how frequently do you attack the movement? What are the principles or pillars you use for programming? Do you view the capacity vs absolute strength debate through a different framework? Episode link: CLICK HERE TO WATCH Notes below: ----------------------------------- 1. SEPARATE THE PROBLEM: STRENGTH VS CAPACITY ----------------------------------- Treat deadlift strength and deadlift capacity as two different adaptations. Strength - Neural output - Confidence in heavy positions Capacity - Repeatability of hinging under fatigue - Often shows up inside mixed-modal work Trying to solve both with the same tool is the mistake. Key takeaway: If you want to get someone stronger, you need to address the neural aspects of strength. If you want them to be able to repeat deadlift under fatigue, that's a 2nd order problem of metabolic demand + strength requirement. ----------------------------------- 2. DEADLIFT STRENGTH IS PRIMARILY A NEURAL PROBLEM ----------------------------------- Move away from high-volume deadlift strength work! What not to do: - High-rep tempo deadlifts (useless for building top-end strength in a healthy well trained athlete) - Large weekly deadlift volume “to get stronger” - Treating deadlift like a hypertrophy lift What to do: - Heavy singles, doubles, triples -80%+ of 1RM 5+ sets per week - Hand-release or full reset reps (no touch-and-go)
1 like • 10d
These are wonderful notes on deadlifting. I think that for lower level CrossFit athletes especially they do not respect the skill of deadlift and it is treated as a "simple movement". This leads to lack of focus or intent in the training of the deadlift, maybe also a lack of respect. This can lead to issues if, due to lack of focus or respect of the movement, they tend to get "tweaky" with their deadlifting. Now they have a movement that they are scared of so they don't want to train it, and even when they were training it they weren't really invested in it. Lack of hamstring/glute strength has been talked about with many CrossFit athletes casually. If athletes do not approach the deadlift as a deadlift, and instead set up with more of a clean stance, their "deadlift" training will continue to support the same more quad/front/squatting pattern of their olympic lifts. This is compounded by the fact that we are already doing a bunch of olympic lifts, and multiple forms of loaded squatting, and squatting in metcons. It would be no surprise then that by building an athlete that is not as balanced from back to front of their legs that they can get tweaked by deadlifting. As you mentioned, doing HEAVY hip thrusts and glute/hamstring/low back strength and support work is probably key to help both build the strength of athletes who tend to get weak by deadlifting, but also help them understand and feel the pattern of that strong butt/hip thrust through the bar. I also wonder if anthropometrics lead to some people just needing less or being able to safely tolerate less deadlift work. I am a short guy with long arms, so deadlift stuff has always been fun and I "get it". Perhaps athletes who are not as well set up to deadlift, and would be a sumo deadlifter in the sport of power lifting, should be approached with deadlift training with more variety of implements (blocks/axels/KBs etc) so they do not put themselves with too much frequency into a position that they anatomically are not strong at, knowing that they need to survive to fight through ALL THE OTHER PULLING they already need to do for a week of programming.
1-4 of 4
Nick Cole-Butler
2
13points to level up
@nick-cole-butler-1189
Pretty ok at CrossFit. Trying to get better.

Active 21h ago
Joined Feb 27, 2026
Powered by