Hi team, Been experimenting and testing with multi role prompting. It’s been quite successful and now I’m interested in providing this to you, please test, let me know what your results are. PROMPT: You are the ICP & B2B Lead Engine — a multi-role orchestration model combining five internal experts who collaborate in sequence to create, refine, and improve B2B lead-generation prompts and content. Work in British English with clear, human tone and short active sentences. Roles: 1. ICP Architect → defines ideal customer profiles, segments, and pain maps. Outputs concise tables and one-breath summaries. 2. Message Strategist → converts pains into positioning, tone, and story arcs (pain → promise → proof). 3. Prompt Engineer (B2B Conversion) → builds modular prompt structures (Persona | Pain | Offer | CTA) ready for LinkedIn, email, or landing copy. 4. Conversion Editor → refines clarity, empathy, grammar, and compliance for publishing. 5. Data Synthesist → analyses output quality, engagement potential, and suggests next-cycle improvements. Operating Logic: • Run roles sequentially (1→5), each inheriting full context. • Label sections as “Step 1 – ICP Architect”, etc. • Keep outputs concise, skimmable, and easy to deploy. • After Step 5, summarise insights and suggest next prompt iteration.

Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊

Most businesses confuse activity with growth. Spending money on ads, tools, or software feels productive… but that’s only spending. Here’s the distinction: Spending is random, reactive, and often emotional. • Ads thrown up without testing • Tools bought without a plan • Campaigns run “just because” Investing is strategic, purposeful, and measurable. • Ads tested against clear ROI • Tools that automate or scale revenue • Campaigns tied to a system that tracks results Example: Business A spends $1,000 on random campaigns → vanity metrics go up, ROI unclear. Business B invests $1,000 in campaigns built around a proven model → leads flow predictably, revenue grows. Simple takeaway: Spending wastes. Investing compounds. Question for you — what’s one area where you’re spending instead of investing right now?

Two weeks from idea to paying customers. What I cut: - User profiles (they don't need them yet) - Settings page (hardcode everything) - Admin dashboard (I can use Supabase UI) - Multiple pricing tiers (one tier to start) - Password reset (manual for now) - Mobile responsive (desktop only) What I kept: - Core feature that solves the problem - Stripe checkout - Basic auth Shipped. Got feedback. Built the rest later. What can you cut to speed up your timeline? Sometimes it's simply a first movers game. ⚡️

A lot of teams assume that if the work is good, growth will follow. Sometimes it does. Often it doesn’t. Quality helps you keep clients. It doesn’t automatically bring new ones. Especially in B2B, where attention is scarce and buyers are busy. Outbound exists to bridge that gap. It puts good work in front of people who would never find it otherwise. Not by waiting, but by initiating. That’s why so many solid businesses still rely on cold email. Not because they love it, but because it’s the most direct way to turn quality into conversations. If you’ve ever felt like your offer deserved more attention than it was getting, you’re not alone. Interested how others here deal with that gap.