Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Michelle

HDD | AI Legacy Hub

39 members • Free

An intentional hub for CEO mindset, AI support, and long-view legacy—designed for leaders who move with clarity.

Memberships

TeezPlace for AI

32 members • $10/m

Skool Scale Camp

4.2k members • Free

Cultivated Cooks

289 members • Free

AI Money Lab

63k members • Free

The Innovations Lounge

68 members • Free

11 contributions to Skool Scale Camp
🧁 How to decide if adding a link to your LinkedIn post is wise
Myth or fact? Adding a link to your LinkedIn post decreases reach. It used to, at least that's what we all believed. We never got it confirmed by LinkedIn. Last year LinkedIn seemed to deny it At least one person at LinkedIn did 😉 Rushi Jobanputra, Senior Director of Product Management: Feed and Content at LinkedIn posted a video short answering the question: Does adding a link in my post impact its reach? He said: "The simple answer is no. We don't intentionally limit the reach if posts with links in it." Rishi explained that "if your post leads with value, the knowledge, insights or key take aways of what's in that link then the link is just there to dive deeper." Reduced reach can be explained by the content and intention of the post more than the simple fact that there is a link. Yet if the sole purpose of your post is to drive traffic to that link, that's not going to create much value for the user and will impact reach. 🤷‍♀️ So why do many experts still say their reach dropped by 30%? Here's some of my thoughts, mind you all based on what we knew about the algorithm before 360Brew 🧁 Dwell time signals that the post offers value. Long posts, posts with a PDF (carousel swipey-type-thing) and posts with uploaded video keep people dwelling on your post. Clicking a link moves people off platform, so no longer dwelling 🧁 Comments were also considered a great signal to the algorithm that the post is valuable. Clicking a link means leaving the platform and who ever goes back, trying to find the post to then leave a comment? But most of all... Say a link does reduce the reach of your post by 40% (random number fo easy math) and let's say 5% of people tend to click a link. 🧁 What would you rather? Post without link, 1000 impressions, 0 clicks or Post with link, 600 impressions, 30 clicks So think about the purpose of your post. Do you want more visibility on LinkedIn, then write a post that sparks engagement. Do you want people to click to something you're promoting... put the link in the post to make clicking easy.
🧁 How to decide if adding a link to your LinkedIn post is wise
0 likes • 3d
This makes sense to me. I think the real question is not whether links hurt reach, but what the post is meant to do. If the goal is engagement, lead with value. If the goal is clicks, make the link easy. Either way, the post still has to stand on its own. I’d rather have meaningful clicks than vanity reach.
Yes, I’m going to do it.
I’ve been building with intention, and I’m still in the process of growing my Skool community in a way that feels aligned and sustainable. I’m clear on the vision, but I’m also paying attention to what actually helps people engage, stay connected, and move deeper into the community. Right now, I’m looking at what my next best steps should be when it comes to growth, visibility, and helping the right people see the value of what I’m building. For those of you who have been growing your communities well, what helped you most in the early stages? What would you focus on next if you were in my position?
0 likes • 3d
@Ann-Marie Burtell Thank you so much for this! I have created a session that helps them with their mindset upon entering the Skool platform. The first module they are introduced to is Identity and Leadership Foundations. This is a 6-week drip course that I created to help set the tone for the platform. There is also a welcome tab which provides an overview of the skool as well as the community they can engage in. Member's also have access to our weekly sessions and can attend no matter the tier.
Start fresh… or build on what already exists?
I’m deciding between evolving my current Facebook group (Collaboration and Community for Fempreneurs) or creating something new on Skool from the ground up. The FB group growth has been slow, but consistent. 50+ members since January, and pretty decent engagement/participation (screen shots below) I’m also really drawn to having both free + paid tiers — connection + deeper support. If you’ve: – Moved a community from Facebook to Skool – Started fresh instead of migrating – Run free + paid tiers I’d love your honest take. What worked? What didn’t? What would you do differently? And if you’ve been in a Skool community — what made you stay?
Start fresh… or build on what already exists?
1 like • 3d
I’d build on what’s already working. If your Facebook group is growing steadily and engagement is solid, that means there’s already trust there. I’d keep Facebook as the connection point and use Skool as the deeper next step for people who want more structure and support. The free + paid model can work well when the path is clear. And from a member perspective, people stay when the community feels active, useful, and well-led.
Help each other find your next 3 members
One of the best ways to grow is to support each other on Skool. So let's do that 👇 Drop a comment with: 1. Your Skool community name + link 2. Who it's for (in one sentence) 3. What members get when they join Then scroll through and join 3 communities that genuinely interest you. Not to game the algorithm. Not for a follow back. Because you're actually curious and want to connect with people building cool things. Let's help each other get those wins 🙌
Help each other find your next 3 members
4 likes • 14d
HDD | AI Legacy Hubhttps://skool.com/hdd-ai-legacy-hub This community is for leaders, creators, and visionaries who want to use AI and simple systems to build with clarity instead of overwhelm. Inside the hub, members learn how to organize their ideas, use AI tools in practical ways, develop a CEO mindset, and build structures that support long-term business and legacy. Always happy to connect with others building thoughtful communities here on Skool.
Creators & Teachers… let me ask you something.
When you have a presentation to give… Are you the color-coded planner with tabs, timestamps, and a backup USB in your purse? Or are you the “Holy Spirit and vibes” type… building the plane while it’s taxiing down the runway? Be honest. Are you scripting every word three weeks in advance… Or pulling it together the night before saying, “Listen… we gone make this work.” 😅 No judgment. Just curiosity. Because sometimes the planners look polished… But the last-minute folks bring fire you can’t manufacture. So which one are you? Planner or Pressure Diamond? 💎 Drop it below. I’m watching 👀✨
Creators & Teachers… let me ask you something.
2 likes • 15d
Honestly… I’m a little bit of both. I’m a planner when it comes to the structure — the outline, the key points, the flow of the message. I like knowing the destination and the path we’re taking to get there. But when it comes to the actual delivery, I leave room for presence and intuition. That’s usually where the real moments happen — the stories, the examples, the things that land with people in the room. So my style is: framework first, fire in the moment. Because the structure keeps things clear… but the energy in the room is what makes the message stick.
1-10 of 11
Michelle Anantua
3
37points to level up
@michelle-anantua-8731
Certified AI business coach, instructional designer, and corporate trainer helping leaders use AI with clarity and showcase products with pride.

Active 2d ago
Joined Feb 21, 2026
Powered by