You can't do much if it's banned permanently.

Most agency owners I have worked with prefer the first angle. They typically position their offer as, X jobs per month (10-15), rather than focusing on the ads themselves. This approach is much better cuz it speaks directly to their bottom line, revenue and growth, instead of technical marketing jargon.

@Marvin S 100% . Marketing/ads feel like extra expense/spending while more jobs feel like extra income.

You can definitely use them, but if the original owner reports it, it could cause a trouble then.

For hiring offshore cold callers via paid ads (Meta ofc), run simple lead gen ads targeting LATAM countries with good hooks like, image ads showing "work from home + pay proof". Optimize for booked interviews (not just completed apps) – cost per booked interview usually lands $15-35 USD depending on country/quality of targeting, and cost per actual hire ends up $150-200 after screening/no-shows. Run ads to a simple Typeform or Google Form application (not Meta instant forms) for better quality , add basic qualifying questions like "How many cold calls/day have you done?" to filter. Test small budgets first and scale winners.

For home services (like kitchens, bathrooms, extensions, or roofing) I usually stick to instant forms for most clients, especially early on or with smaller budgets, because they get way more submissions fast and cheap (people fill them without leaving the app). Landing pages can work great for higher intent/quality but need more spend (£200-500+ min to test properly), strong hooks (before/afters, testimonials, urgency), fast load times, and clear CTAs, 50 pounds is too low to judge. My Approach: Start with instant forms + good qualifying questions (budget, project size, timeline), then once you have some data and budget, test a simple landing page against it to see which pulls better closes. Instant forms win volume, landing pages win quality if done right. Keep testing!