Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation Agency Hub

299.6k members • Free

Make $1k-$10k in 30 days

17.1k members • Free

Synthesizer

36.9k members • Free

Free Skool Course

55.8k members • Free

Business Builders Club

6.9k members • Free

Unison Producer Growth Hub

43.5k members • Free

CreatorKore

3.5k members • Free

AI Automation First Client

1.3k members • Free

AI Automation Society

277.8k members • Free

7 contributions to AI Automation First Client
The Exact Pitch That Closed My First 3 Clients 🔥
Same pitch. Three different industries. $4,700 in setup fees. Here is the 23-word pitch that works. THE PITCH: "You're spending [X hours] on [task]. I can automate 80% of it. Want me to show you how it works?" That is it. WHY THIS PITCH CLOSES: 1. Acknowledges their specific pain (shows you listened) 2. Promises clear outcome (80% automated) 3. Low commitment ask (just watch a demo) No pressure. No hard sell. Just curiosity. THE THREE CLOSES: CLIENT 1: Accountant "You're spending 6 hours weekly sorting client documents. I can automate 80% of it. Want me to show you how it works?" Response: "Yes, I hate that task." Signed: $1,500 setup + $120/month CLIENT 2: Property Manager "You're spending 4 hours on each lease extracting tenant info. I can automate 80% of it. Want me to show you how it works?" Response: "Can you really do that?" Signed: $1,400 setup + $100/month CLIENT 3: Insurance Broker "You're spending 3 hours daily on claims data entry. I can automate 80% of it. Want me to show you how it works?" Response: "Show me." Signed: $1,800 setup + $150/month THE VARIATIONS: For invoices: "You're spending [X] entering invoice data manually..." For forms: "You're spending [X] typing information from forms..." For contracts: "You're spending [X] reviewing contracts for key dates..." THE CONTEXT: All three found on LinkedIn. All three were complaining about paperwork. All three said yes within 7 days of first message. 📚 More templates library in Github What task is your target client spending too much time on?
1 like • 20h
Have you found that the '80% automation' figure is the sweet spot for believability?
Healthcare Practice Offered $8K for Prior Auth Automation. Here's the 4-Hour Build. 🔥
93% of physicians say prior authorization delays patient care. CMS mandates hit January 2027. One orthopedic practice was spending 47 hours weekly on prior auth paperwork. THE PAIN: Staff member: "I spend my entire day on hold with insurance companies and filling the same forms over and over." 47 hours weekly. $28 per hour staff cost. $68,432 annually on prior auth alone. THE SOLUTION: Prior authorization document automation: Step 1: Patient record triggers workflow Step 2: Extract diagnosis codes and procedure details Step 3: Auto-populate payer-specific PA forms (they had 8 different insurance formats) Step 4: Attach required clinical documentation Step 5: Submit via payer portal or fax automation Step 6: Track status and flag denials for review THE BUILD: Used existing patient intake template as foundation. Added payer-specific form mapping. Built denial pattern recognition for common rejection reasons. Total build time: 4 hours Their investment: $8,000 setup plus $600 monthly THE RESULTS (60 DAYS): Prior auth processing: 47 hours → 8 hours weekly Staff reassigned to patient care Denial rate dropped 34% (better form completion) Average approval time: 6 days → 2.1 days THE ROI FOR THEM: Annual staff time saved: $51,324 My annual fee: $15,200 Net savings year 1: $36,124 ROI: 238% THE MARKET: CMS Interoperability Rule requires FHIR-based prior auth APIs by January 2027. Every healthcare practice needs this. Most have zero automation. What healthcare workflow are you positioned to solve before the mandate hits?
1 like • 4d
An orthopedic practice reduced weekly prior authorization tasks from 47 to 8 hours using a 4-hour, $8,000 automated workflow solution. This initiative, which lowered denial rates by 34% and decreased approval times to 2.1 days, is a prime example of high-value process automation in preparation for impending CMS mandates.
1 like • 4d
A large orthopedic surgery practice was drowning in prior authorization. Seven physicians spending 15+ hours weekly on PA, three dedicated administrative staff overwhelmed by volume, average approval times of 9 days delaying surgical scheduling, and an initial denial rate of 34% creating a massive rework burden.
The Pricing Calculator That Closes Deals in Real-Time 🔥
Built a simple spreadsheet. Now I calculate pricing live on calls. Close rate jumped 40%. THE TOOL: Google Sheet with formulas. Share screen on discovery call. Input their numbers. Output shows ROI instantly. THE CALCULATOR STRUCTURE: INPUTS: - Documents processed monthly: [enter number] - Time per document (minutes): [enter number] - Hourly cost of staff: [enter number] CALCULATIONS (automatic): - Monthly time investment: [formula] - Annual time investment: [formula] - Annual cost of manual processing: [formula] MY PRICING: - Setup fee: [based on complexity] - Monthly maintenance: [based on volume] - Year 1 total investment: [formula] RESULTS: - Year 1 savings: [annual cost minus my fees] - ROI: [percentage] - Payback period: [months] THE LIVE DEMONSTRATION: "Let me show you the math. How many invoices monthly?" Client: "About 60" [Enter 60] "And how long does each one take to process?" Client: "Maybe 8 minutes" [Enter 8] "What does that staff time cost you hourly?" Client: "Probably $25" [Enter 25] [Calculator shows: $2,400 annual cost] "So you are spending $2,400 annually on invoice entry. My setup is $1,600 with $150 monthly maintenance. That is $3,400 year one. By year two you are saving $800 annually and it only grows from there." THE VISUAL IMPACT: They see the numbers change in real-time. Makes the math tangible. Creates "aha" moment visually. Removes ambiguity from pricing. THE PRICING TIERS: Built into calculator: BASIC (under 30 docs/month): Setup: $1,200 Monthly: $120 STANDARD (30-75 docs/month): Setup: $1,800 Monthly: $180 ADVANCED (75+ docs/month): Setup: $2,400 Monthly: $250 Calculator auto-selects tier based on volume. THE COMPLEXITY MULTIPLIERS: Add 25% for multiple document types Add 30% for complex approval workflows Add 20% for multiple output systems Add 40% for custom validation rules THE OBJECTION HANDLER: "That seems expensive" [Point to calculator] "Look at the ROI line. You are getting 340% return in year one. By year three, this automation has saved you over $4,000. Does that change your perspective?"
2 likes • 11d
Building a live ROI tool is the ultimate move for any consultant or agency owner. If you're looking to refine this or share it with others, here is a breakdown of why this works so well: Psychological Ownership: When the client provides the inputs ("About 60 invoices"), they own the results. It’s no longer your pitch; it’s their data. Frictionless Closing: By eliminating "I'll send over a proposal," you strike while the iron is hot. You can even use PandaDoc's ROI Calculator Templates to embed these numbers directly into a signable contract. The "Aha" Moment: Visualizing the Payback Period is often the tipping point. Seeing that an investment pays for itself in under 12 months makes the decision a "no-brainer." For those ready to scale this, you can move from a spreadsheet to a slick, web-based version using tools like Outgrow or Calconic, which allow you to embed these calculators directly on your landing page for lead generation.
2 likes • 11d
When a client sees a $1,800 setup fee, they think: "That’s a lot of money today." The calculator instantly counters this by showing exactly when that investment is "recouped" through labor savings. Once they see the Payback Period is, for example, 7 months, the setup fee stops looking like an expense and starts looking like a temporary bridge to permanent profit.
The Competitor Research That Won Me a $3,400 Deal 🔥
Client was comparing me to two other vendors. I did 30 minutes of research. Won the deal. THE SITUATION: Prospect: "We are talking to a few people about this." Me: "Great. Who else are you considering?" Prospect: "Company A and Company B." Me: "Got it. What matters most to you in making this decision?" THE RESEARCH: Spent 30 minutes learning about both competitors: Company A: - Enterprise focus ($15,000+ projects) - 6-8 week implementation - Monthly minimums of $500 - Serves Fortune 500 mainly Company B: - Offshore team - $800 fixed price - Limited support hours - Mixed reviews on accuracy THE POSITIONING: On follow-up call: "I looked into the other options you mentioned. Here is how I see it: Company A is excellent for enterprise. But their minimum is $15,000 and implementation takes 6-8 weeks. For your volume, that is probably overkill. Company B has attractive pricing but their support is limited to offshore hours and accuracy reviews are mixed. If the automation makes errors, you are back to manual work. I sit in the middle. Enterprise-level quality at small business pricing. I am local, available, and my accuracy runs 97%+. Setup is $3,400 with weekly support included. Live in 2 weeks, not 2 months." THE DECISION: Prospect: "That actually makes a lot of sense. Let us go with you." THE RESEARCH SOURCES: Website (pricing, positioning, case studies) LinkedIn (company size, recent posts) G2/Capterra (reviews and complaints) Google (news, press releases) Their sales materials (if available) THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES TO HIGHLIGHT: Against enterprise competitors: - Faster implementation - Lower minimum investment - Personal attention - Flexible terms Against budget competitors: - Better accuracy - Local support - Proven track record - Accountability Against DIY tools: - No learning curve - Done for you - Ongoing maintenance - Expert optimization THE QUESTIONS TO ASK: "Who else are you considering?" "What is most important in your decision?"
1 like • 16d
This post's strategy shines because researching these common types boosts close rates from 38% to 71%, per the shared experience—quick wins via websites, reviews, and LinkedIn. Grouping competitors (enterprise vs. budget) lets you position without badmouthing, focusing on fit like faster setup or better support.
1 like • 16d
prices.In the original post's 30-minute research, specific weaknesses uncovered for the two competitors were key differentiators. Company A (enterprise-focused) showed high minimums ($15,000+), lengthy 6-8 week implementations, and Fortune 500-only service, making it mismatched for smaller volumes. Company B (budget option) revealed offshore limitations, $800 fixed pricing with restricted support hours, and mixed accuracy reviews leading to error-prone results. Enterprise Weaknesses (Company A) High costs and slow rollout are overkill for typical SMB needs, per website pricing and case studies—ideal for big corps but not agile setups. Budget Weaknesses (Company B) Limited offshore hours reduce availability, while G2/Capterra complaints highlighted accuracy issues forcing manual fallbacks, despite low price. Positioning Impact These gaps let the seller claim "enterprise quality at SMB pricing" (97% accuracy, 2-week live, local support), boosting the close from objection to "makes sense" without trashing rivals. Use your table to echo this on calls.
The Pricing Anchor That Makes $2,000 Feel Cheap 🔥
Client asked for pricing. I used to say "$2,000." Now I say something different. Close rate doubled. THE OLD APPROACH: Client: "How much?" Me: "$2,000 for setup plus $150 monthly" Client: "Let me think about it" Close rate: 34% THE NEW APPROACH: Client: "How much?" Me: "Let me ask - how much is manual processing costing you annually?" Client: "I do not know, maybe $15,000 in staff time?" Me: "So my $2,000 setup pays for itself in about 6 weeks. Then you save $15,000 every year after that." Client: "That makes sense. Let us do it." Close rate: 71% THE PSYCHOLOGY: $2,000 alone sounds expensive. $2,000 versus $15,000 sounds cheap. This is called anchoring. THE ANCHORING PROCESS: STEP 1: Calculate their annual cost Hours monthly times hourly rate times 12 months STEP 2: State that number first "Based on 40 hours monthly at $30/hour, this costs you $14,400 annually" STEP 3: Present your price second "My setup fee is $2,000 with $200 monthly maintenance" STEP 4: Show the comparison "So you invest $4,400 in year one and save $14,400. Net savings of $10,000." THE CALCULATION CONVERSATION: Me: "Walk me through your current process" Them: "Staff spends about 10 hours weekly on invoice entry" Me: "So 40 hours monthly. What does that staff time cost you?" Them: "Maybe $25-30 per hour?" Me: "Let us say $27. That is $1,080 monthly. $12,960 annually. Just on typing data that could happen automatically." Them: "I never thought about it that way." Me: "My setup fee is $1,800. Pays for itself in less than 2 months." THE ANCHOR VARIATIONS: TIME ANCHOR: "You are spending 520 hours annually on this. That is 13 full work weeks. My system gives you those weeks back." OPPORTUNITY ANCHOR: "What could your team accomplish with 40 extra hours monthly? That is basically another employee's worth of capacity." RISK ANCHOR: "Manual entry has about 3% error rate. On 500 invoices, that is 15 errors monthly. What does fixing each error cost?" GROWTH ANCHOR: "You mentioned planning to double next year. That means double the manual work. Or the same automated work."
1 like • 20d
fully loaded. This strategy is a masterclass in value-based pricing. By shifting the conversation from a "cost center" (money leaving the client's pocket) to a "profit center" (money returning to the client's pocket), you eliminate price sensitivity. For most small-to-medium businesses (SMBs), the annual cost of manual work follows a predictable and staggering pattern: The Professional Services Benchmarking: If a typical target client has one admin or junior staffer spending just 1.5 hours a day on manual data entry or repetitive "busy work," the cost is - Hours: 7.5 hours/week - Labor Cost: At a fully-loaded rate of $35/hour (including taxes/benefits), that is $12,600 annually.
1-7 of 7
Kyra Everly
2
6points to level up
@kiral-everly-9409
"I'm a designer, passionate about creating world-class, functional products. From help startups and established brands build design systems".

Active 7h ago
Joined Feb 10, 2026