County Walk Update — HUGE Win for Monument Glamping!
We had our county walk today with the Planning Department. What was supposed to be a quick visit turned into nearly an hour of hashing out boundaries and definitions — literally. We walked down to King’s Quarters and spent most of the time arguing over where the property line actually sits, whether the tent is truly a tent, and how to map out every foot of the site. This time, though, we had the Planning Director himself with us instead of just the enforcement officer calling the shots. The enforcement officer was still stubborn about how exact the map needed to be. Even though he couldn’t prove the boundary, he kept insisting I was within it by about 10 feet. His claim came from OnX, and when I pointed out that OnX could be off, he said, “Well, not by 10 feet.” I asked, “Then how many?” He didn’t know. That’s when the Planning Director stepped in and said, basically, “Let’s not waste taxpayer money on a survey.” His solution: get stakes in the ground, mark it clearly, and the county will work from there. No neighbor complaints, so just make it 25 feet back and move on. He also clarified that our site map needs to change — instead of each tent being a 16x16 box, we’ll represent them as 60x60-foot lots, and make sure each tent sits correctly inside. Here’s where the good news gets better: the Floodplain Administrator reviewed photos of King’s Quarters and confirmed that it’s a soft-sided structure — a tent, not a building. That same finding could end up clearing my Building Department violation too, since it’s based on the same misunderstanding. So, in short — we walked away with a path to full compliance. The boundaries are set, the map is being redrawn, and the tent issue looks to be resolved across both departments. It’s been a long road, but this meeting finally felt like progress. [I read this post to Wendy, and she added: "Now we can build all our tents just like King's Quarters!"]