Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Lead Generation Secrets

22.1k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

291.3k members • Free

Imperium Academy™

48.2k members • Free

High Level Agency

443 members • Free

11 contributions to Lead Generation Secrets
Advice on my new Email copy
Hello guys, I am targeting roofers in USA and my offer is as follows : We run meta ads (video ads made by AI and real roofing images in video) for roofers and as a lead is generated and fill the meta lead form our AI caller calls them under 60 seconds and qualify them and book inspections on call , if they do not pic then we give them a follow up call and SMS . To increase show up rate we call them before inspection and we provide sales script based on qualification questions data to close the job. This is an all in one client aquisition solution that we provide to roofers on 1500$ setup and 1200$ retainer( for both meta ads and AI caller) so this is my codo email copy. Email copy: Subject: Your roofing jobs are waiting, John? Hey {{firstName}}, What usually happens to the homeowners who reach out to {{companyName}} for a roofing estimate or inspection that cost ad spend and office time but never end up booking the job? In most roofing businesses, the real issue isn’t demand but turning that demand into booked inspections and paid jobs. We help roofing companies book 8–12 qualified inspections in 30 days, without manual calling, and provide proven scripts to turn those inspections into paying jobs. Is this something you already have covered, or worth taking a closer look? @Jay Feldman
1 like • 48m
Please guide me on this @Jay Feldman
🚨 Emergency Drop: This AI Is Moving Too Fast to Ignore 🚨
I didn’t plan this video. No fancy edits. No script. But I had to hit record. There’s a new AI tech blowing up right now and unlike most hype cycles, this one is actually dangerous (in a good way) if you’re an online business owner. In the last 7 days, I’ve been using an open-source system that has quietly become: - My executive assistant - My developer - My designer - My project manager - My internal ops layer It texts me. Emails for me. Books meetings. Manages Slack. Tracks tasks. Builds apps. And gets better every single day. This is not another AI agent demo that skips the hard parts. In this video, I walk you through: - What this tech actually is (and what it replaces) - The exact setup I’m using - How I gave it its own email, calendar, iMessage, and Slack access - How to turn it into a real “employee,” not a toy - The security mistakes to avoid And lots more! If you’re busy, scaling, or drowning in admin work… This will feel like cheating. 👉 Watch the video now I’ve put together a full setup guide + checklist to avoid the common traps. Comment “Guide” and I’ll share it.
2 likes • 5d
Guide
Cold Email Copy Is Broken (Here’s Why)
Cold email copy lives in a weird dilemma. You want: • opens • replies • booked calls But you also need to: • avoid spam • not sound salesy • not trip deliverability Most people overcomplicate this. After sending hundreds of thousands of cold emails, and helping 1,281+ people write cold email copy that actually gets replies, I simplified everything into a 3-step framework. Step 1: Bait the Open Before anyone reads your email… they decide whether to open it. That decision is driven by: • the subject line • the preview text (first sentence) Together, they must spark curiosity and stay relevant. They cannot sound promotional. The goal is simple: Make it feel like it could be from a colleague, client, or vendor. If it sounds like marketing → spam risk goes up. Step 2: Win the 3-Second Impression Once the email is opened, you have about 3 seconds. Your first 2–3 sentences should do three things: 1. Surface a real problem they recognize 2. Hint at a solution 3. Establish quiet credibility Not a pitch. Not a bio. Just enough context to make them think: “This might be relevant.” Miss this window, and the email is dead. Step 3: Get the “Yes” Cold email is not about closing. It’s about starting a conversation. The easiest way to do that? • Ask a clear, low-friction question • Make the reply effortless If they can respond with a simple “Yes”, you’ve done your job. Everything after that is sales. By the way, I’ve got something that makes this entire process much easier. Comment “Cold” and I’ll send it over.
1 like • 16d
Cold
1 like • 16d
Cold
AI SMMA vs Lead Follow up system
Hey everyone 👋 I’d really appreciate some honest input from the community (and Jay if you see this). I’m currently testing two different offers and want to sanity-check which one is better to scale long-term in terms of: ease of selling predictability client retention stress / chaos and speed to cash Offer 1: LFS (Lead Follow-Up System) Automates SMS/email follow-up after inbound leads Focused on speed-to-lead, missed opportunities, show-up rates More ops / backend efficiency play Feels stickier once installed, but harder to explain + sell cold Offer 2: AI SMMA for Roofing (USA) Meta ads → AI caller (Synthflow) → booked inspections Selling booked appointments, not leads Very clear pain (“we want more inspections”) Easier to pitch, but more moving parts (ads, AI, expectations) My current thinking: LFS feels calmer + higher retention but harder to sell initially AI SMMA feels easier to sell + faster cash, but potentially more chaotic For those who’ve run agencies, SMMA, or ops-heavy offers: Which would YOU choose to scale right now and why? If your goal was predictable income (~$6k+), which path makes more sense? Any blind spots I’m missing on either model? Would really value different perspectives here 🙏 Thanks in advance. @Jay Feldman
3
0
Reviewing cold email copy
Hey Jay — would really appreciate your eyes on this if you get a moment. I’m running cold outreach for a speed-to-lead & follow-up system sold to service-based businesses (coaches, consultants, professional services). I’m currently testing neutral/curious openers vs diagnostic openers, keeping everything else the same. 👉 My question: From a copy perspective (not structure), does this framing do a good enough job earning replies — or is there any obvious friction / over-explaining you’d trim? EMAIL COPY: Subject:Your leads are waiting 2+ hours, Jessica? Hello Jessica, Most {industry} businesses aren't challenged by lead volume — it’s what happens after a lead comes in that silently impacts revenue. Out of curiosity, how long does it typically take your team at {companyname} to follow up with an inquiry? (For most teams we speak with, it’s 2–6 hours without them realizing it.) If useful, I can put together a short 2-minute Lead Flow Risk Assessment for {companyname} . It's a quick Loom showing where lead momentum typically breaks after an inquiry. Worth me putiing this together for you? @Jay Feldman
3 likes • 17d
@Kyle Burt Hey Kyle I was thinking about this and has changed the copy alot since then and also A/B testing new subject line because I think this one screams cold email from itself. So This is my new email and subject line as per jay advice and my own analysis. Subject:About your booking flow, Jessica Hey Jessica, Out of curiosity, how long does it generally take your team at ShadowOfaDancer to follow up with an inquiry? I can put together a short 2-minute Loom for ShadowOfaDancer showing where lead momentum typically breaks after an inquiry. Worth me putting this together for you? Now I am still using loom as main cta which might increase friction but I have changed everything else.
1 like • 17d
@Kyle Burt Hey Kyle actually for now I am just changing my subject line and after 5 days of test if the reply or results are same then I will try to remove loom and convert the copy to a conversational tone because right now the subject line has changed by me but if I would also change the copy then I won't be able to predict the test results correctly
1-10 of 11
Ishan Saini
3
35points to level up
@ishan-saini-5465
Me

Active 47m ago
Joined Dec 12, 2025
Powered by