What does Metaâs Andromeda update mean for you?
And whatâs UpHex doing about it? Hereâs what changed and why it matters: **Micro-targeting is dead.** No more 15 ad sets with hyper-specific filters. The algo works better with broad campaigns and clean structures. âď¸This is not much of an update or us, weâve been preaching this for a long time already. **Creative is the targeting.** Meta doesnât just pick audiences anymore, it matches each user to the creative that fits them best. âď¸This is not much of an update or us, weâve been preaching this for a long time already **Variety beats duplication.** Five headlines that say the same thing? Waste of time. What works now is distinct angles, pain, proof, ROI, opportunity, authority. âď¸This is new(ish). But variety in your creative has longer paying dividends when it comes to back-end optimization. Gonna be a lot easier! So hereâs what you should actually do: Run broad campaigns with Campaign Budget Optimization. Use Dynamic Creative: load in 5 very different creatives so Meta can mix and match what converts. Build angles, not duplicates: Like âStop wasting moneyâ vs âHereâs a new opportunityâ vs â300+ businesses already trust us.â Pretty easy actually. **Current recommendations:** 1. If you have campaigns running and getting results⌠just let them go. Donât stress out and think you gotta react⌠let them ride baby. 2. Take your winning templates, duplicate them, and make these changes: - Switch to dynamic creative - Get up to 5 distinct angles - Get three headline-copy variables Weâre gonna update Uppie to perform this for you as well. In the meantime, if you want a GPT thatâll spit this out for ya⌠**Comment âTeam UpHexâ** Also, I just gotta say⌠This is exactly what weâve built Uphex around for years. Simple structures. Creative-led targeting. Campaigns that optimize themselves. Thatâs why our agencies consistently see lead costs around $12. Thatâs why the best agencies in the game use UpHex. And thatâs why shifts like Andromeda donât hurt our clientsâŚ