Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Bernie

LeadIndicator.ai

529 members • Free

Mastering AI for business success

Memberships

Launch Your Community on Skool

227 members • Free

Profit Consultants Network

4.4k members • Free

Viral Coach Training Material

19.7k members • Free

Your AI Operating System

49 members • Free

Assistable.ai

3.1k members • Free

TheTechStack.ai University

410 members • Free

Nexis AI w/Jason

486 members • Free

promptedForge

58 members • Free

Predictable Profits Mastermind

820 members • Free

338 contributions to Assistable.ai
2 Questions on Jorden's Video
I just finished Jordan’s video on Building a Production AI Voice Bot and had 2 clarifying questions: 1. Does the built-in Assistable knowledge base work with phone-based AI assistant conversations, or is it limited to chatbots and web call bots? 2. Why do we need to build a vector database using Supabase with Proship integration for the knowledge base? Would the built-in knowledge base function the same way, or is there a meaningful difference in capability or use case? Thanks in advance for the clarification!
1 like • 3d
The built in knowledge base only works for AI chat by default. You must turn on the Voice Knowledge base for $15/month if you want the KB to work for your AI voice assistant. (Soon, there will no longer be a $15 monthly charge but instead a per minute charge) You don't need to build a vector database using Supabase. This is mainly for people who want to avoid the $15 charge or just want to do their own thing/have more control.
1 like • 3d
@Lian Jin I haven't seen any discernible difference in speed. Yes, the built-in KB is different from the one in GHL. GHL is GHL. This is Assistable. Two separate platforms.
Do we need to create an account for our client?
In our GHL sub account + assistable iframe, it's asking our clients to log in/create an account. DO we need to create one for them? how does this work?
Do we need to create an account for our client?
0 likes • 3d
@Grace Ngo they can simply enter their own email address and create their PW on that screen and basically create the account themselves
🚀 Assistable Community — Free Snapshot Drop
Quick context: Last week I ran a free workshop inside the LeadIndicator group. During that session, I walked through the exact Assistable workflows and automations we use internally — the real ones that run our business, support, fulfillment, and scaling. There was a lot of interest in getting those workflows, and since the workshop was positioned as pure value with nothing to sell, I decided to give the entire snapshot away for free to that group. Rather than keep that value isolated, I want to make it available here as well. ✅ What I’m giving you - The full Assistable snapshot - The exact workflows we use internally - No stripped-down templates - No pitch, upsell, or funnel This is not something we normally give out publicly. The only thing I’m asking in return If you’ve found value in Assistable, I’m asking for one small favor: 👉 Go to Google, search for Assistable's TrustPilot page. Leave an honest review on our Truspilot page. That’s it. Reviews matter a lot — especially as we continue to grow and as we deal with the occasional bad-faith review that comes with scale. Your feedback genuinely helps. 📬 How to get the snapshot - leave a review on our TrustPilot page - Comment that you've left the review and I'll DM you.
🚀 Assistable Community — Free Snapshot Drop
0 likes • 3d
Hey @Ariel Preston , I sent you a DM with the snapshot
0 likes • 3d
@Tony Gomez Thanks! DMd you
Assistable Without GHL
Is there an easy way to implement Assistable in other platforms instead of GHL ?
1 like • 3d
Coming soon
A letter to the CEO- Please share your thoughts
First of all I just want to give a massive shoutout to @Jorden Williams. What he's created up until this point is truly remarkable. I've been a customer since the early days and it's been incredible to see the growth of the company. When any company grows that fast you're always going to run into challenges along the way and I know Jorden will be working tirelessly behind the scenes to make everything right and we are all going to need to have some more patience. But I'm at the point now whereby I'm fearful of scaling my AI offer. A huge part of our offer is based around Assistable and we have the opportunity to work with really high value companies which right now I'm not confident of serving. Theres a few things I will like to put forward and see what other peoples thoughts are. 1. Is to get the current systems and processes we have access to in Assistable right now to be robust and to work continuously so we can confidently offer our services to business. All the features we have at the minute are enough to scale to 7 figures per year. I don't think we need anything new. 2 . Is to have a solid support system in place. I understand there will be challenges here and there as we are dealing with tech, anyone who doesn't think so is simply naive. I would confidently want to know that when challenges arrive we have the capability to get them fixed promptly and effectively. To be honest I'm not quite sure how Jorden has managed to get his company to this size on his own its quite remarkable but I think we will agree that any company this size needs humans to help it operate efficiently. I will happily pay for priority support. 3 . Is for any any major updates to be scheduled in advance so we can get prepared for anything that might be effected. 4 . A road map of exactly whats been worked on and what we can expect to see in the future. None of this is negative in any way shape or form. I'm simply just voicing my concerns as a loyal customer hoping that we can all work together to make the product the best on the market.
3 likes • Jan '25
To bounce off what @Barry Riddell said, there needs to be a proper dev environment/testing environment so that @Jorden Williams and team can make edits, play around with the system, test it, break it, etc WITHOUT AFFECTING USERS. When I used to work on large financial management systems we would literally have like 5-10 test environments so that we would never, under any circumstances, disrupt the day-to-day activity of the active users. (I assume you already have a dev environment but the framework for how they are being used needs to be improved). The daily users (and their clients) should not be logging into the platform and see that things are "under construction". If a part of the system is under construction, it should be under construction in a separate environment until it is thoroughly tested and ready to go live. We should not be treating the entire platform, which has thousands of users, and is the backbone of some people's business like it is some live Google doc.
0 likes • 4d
@Isaac Cheatham yes this is in place
1-10 of 338
Bernie White
6
1,324points to level up
@bernard-white-9932
Chief Revenue Officer | Assistable.ai

Active 11m ago
Joined May 8, 2024
Powered by