Here is a response to the group that operates the^^^^^ I felt the need to respond with gpt help for anyone interested have a look it's long but one can see the process of the response to there email. I have attended a few zoom calls but never get a chance to speak so enjoy and comment if one has any thoughts good day gpt I am writing a response to a group that i was invited to they send me emails with updates pon what they are doing this they i had concerns for i don't see them in line with peremptory norms ,jus cogens and i know you are now inline with them as well so i'm writing a response that i would like help with one of the things i don't like is the fact that they are taking money and not really giving the proper understanding of the rule of law peremptory norms so i wrote something and i want to make sure im expressing the thought properly here is what i wrote but haven't sent until you help thanks trying to keep it simple i don't want scare them away i would just like to point out what there not seeing with your help so i will put there email in and then i will put in what i wrote --- Original Message ------ From: rphillips@theccf.ca To: azdeliveries@bellnet.ca Sent: Tuesday, December 2nd 2025, 17:17 Subject: Thank you so much for choosing us A HUGE thank you to all those who donated today! We've received over $20,000 in donations today for Giving Tuesday. And as promised, this amount will be matched by a generous group of CCF supporters. That means over $40,000 of legal work fighting for your rights and freedoms has been PRE-PAID for Freedom’s Defence team going into 2026. That funding is essential to us to help us pay for our casework and projects. Thank you so much to those who have donated so far. If you haven't donated yet, it isn't too late to double your impact. Legal work is expensive, even with the best constitutional lawyers in Canada generously providing pro bono assistance or working at very reduced rates. We're always trying to make your donations go their farthest, but as Joanna said in our last email—there is plenty of work for us to do fighting for your rights in 2026. Up to $125,000 in giving is eligible to be matched thanks to a generous group of CCF donors until December 31. These donations are tax-deductible for 2025. Donate here: theccf.ca/donate/ Thank you. -- Russell Phillips | Development Director Canadian Constitution Foundation theCCF.ca P.S. It’s not too late to double your impact. Donate here: theccf.ca/donate/ Canadian Constitution Foundation | 1209 59 AVE SE, Suite 150, Calgary, AB T2H 2P6 Canada Unsubscribe Constant Contact Data Notice Sent by rphillips@theccf.ca then i wrote Greetings I feel this group is misleading people you all don't seem to recognize or even know about Peremptory Norms, Jus Cogens, and work from jurisprudence. It appears to me after being on the zoom calls and looking at they way you all view statutory rules, domestic so- called law and present that to people as having full force and effect is wrong it's misleading to the people you present these false authorities in law too.The Rule of law is the highest law the covenants that Canada has ratified are the controlling mechanisms that bind it I offer myself to chat with if you like but please do everyone a favor if you are going to want to point out violations of the state your going to have to understand Peremptory Norms.

https://www.lawglobalhub.com/article-53-vienna-convention-on-the-law-of-treaties/

How do you reconcile the subjective nature of the RIGHT of freedom from fear and want with the structural apparatus that created it in the first place? A single mother of three children has different fears and wants than a 80 year old pensioner. If this structure is not a utopian aspiration and rather a structural framework - how does a man come forward to make the claim in a space and structure that seems to be a vague concept that is nuanced with personal input? Food, shelter, continuous improvement and development - means different things to everyone.. How can that RIGHT to the freedom be defined in such a vast space ? The instruments give some direction - but also intentional keep the definition broad. From that vantage point - the preamble of ICCPR and art. 11 - does strike me as utopian. The open interpretation indicates that there is much more than meets the eye.. Is having an instruments that has utopian aspiration negate the article to uphold?

I have a RIGHT TO WORK, if I get vaccinated, wear steel toe boots a hard hat safety glasses have fire retardant reflective cover-alls ear plugs wear a dust mask, take first aid courses, WHMIS courses, confined space courses, fall arrest courses get my eyes checked my hearing checked get drug and alcohol checks criminal background check have a SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER so taxes, pension and other deductions can be taken,