Write something
Pinned
21h •
🎭 When Everyone on Your Team Uses AI Differently, the Business Sounds Like Five People
Individual AI adoption inside a team almost always looks reasonable at the individual level. Each person picks tools that work for them, develops prompting habits that feel natural, applies their own sense of what good output looks like. None of this seems like a problem in the moment. It's just people using tools the way people use tools. But viewed from the outside, from a client's perspective looking at the collective output of a team, the picture often looks different. Different tools, different quality bars, different tones, different levels of AI reliance across team members can add up to a business that sounds inconsistent, even when every individual is doing perfectly reasonable work on their own terms. ------------- Context ------------- Before AI, teams naturally converged toward a somewhat consistent voice and quality standard, partly because there were fewer tools shaping output and partly because most content and communication passed through some form of shared review or house style. AI has introduced significantly more variability into that picture, because AI tools shape output in ways that are specific to the tool, the prompting approach, and the individual using them. Two team members working on similar client deliverables, both using AI assistance, can produce noticeably different results: different sentence structures, different depths of analysis, different default tones, different levels of polish, depending on which tool they favor and how they've learned to use it. Individually, both outputs might be perfectly good. Collectively, if a client sees work from both team members, the inconsistency becomes visible in a way that erodes the sense of a coherent, unified business. A small consulting firm discovered this when a client who had worked with two different team members on related projects mentioned, gently, that the two deliverables felt like they'd come from different companies. Both were high quality individually. But the tone, structure, and analytical style were different enough that the client noticed and found it slightly disorienting. Neither team member had done anything wrong by their own standards. But the firm's collective output lacked the coherence that clients expect from a single business.
Pinned
5d •
Fable 5 is Back! Here's the Best Way to Use It...
Anthropic finally brought Fable 5 back and in the same week, they also launched the new Sonnet 5 model. In this video, I break down everything you need to know about these models and explains which one you should be using. Enjoy!
Pinned
9d •
What Success Actually Buys You
Most people think success is about money. It's not. Money is just what buys you options. I've worked hard for decades. Not because I fell in love with the grind, but because I fell in love with what the work could create. Every uncomfortable conversation. Every risk. Every time I wanted to quit but didn't. None of it was just to make more. It was to own my time. To be there for the people I love. To create memories instead of regrets. To have the freedom to say yes to what matters and no to what doesn't. Don't chase success because you want to look successful. Chase it because one day you'll realize time is the only thing you can't earn back. Work hard. Do the uncomfortable things. Become the person capable of creating the life you want. Because real success isn't measured by what you own. It's measured by how fully you get to live. Question for you: If you had complete freedom over your time one year from now, what would you spend more of it doing... and who would you spend it with?
1h •
⚡ Productivity Quick win
Tool: ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 update) Why This Tool: OpenAI just released GPT-5.6 on July 9, 2026, its most capable model family yet, available to paid ChatGPT users now. The update also launches ChatGPT Work, a new built-in agent that can complete multi-step tasks across your apps, files, and the web autonomously while you focus on something else. Best For: Solopreneurs and business owners who want a capable AI for everyday knowledge work and writing, coaches and consultants who produce a lot of documents, decks, and research, content creators who want a fast and reliable model for drafting and ideation, operators who want to automate multi-step workflows without building anything technical, anyone already using ChatGPT Plus or Pro who wants to know what just changed Cost: Free plan available (limited access, US users now see ads), Go at $8/month, Plus at $20/month, Pro at $100/month and $200/month, check chatgpt.com/pricing for current plan details. GPT-5.6 Sol is available on Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise plans. Website: chatgpt.com Quick Win Prompt: "Log into ChatGPT and check your model picker. If you're on Plus or above, you should now see GPT-5.6 options available. Select GPT-5.6 Sol for a task that requires real depth: a detailed strategy, a complex research summary, a proposal, or a thorough piece of writing. Then open ChatGPT Work from the desktop app on Mac or Windows and give it a multi-step task, something like 'summarize these three uploaded documents and create a one-page brief I can share with a client.' Let it run. Watch how it works across your files without you having to manage each step manually." Other Things GPT-5.6 Adds: - Three model tiers for different tasks: Sol is the flagship for complex reasoning and long-form work, Terra is the balanced mid-tier for everyday production tasks, and Luna is the fastest option for quick drafts and simple queries. You pick based on what the task actually needs rather than defaulting to one model for everything. - ChatGPT Work: A new autonomous agent that reads context from your connected apps and files, then creates documents, spreadsheets, and presentations independently. Tasks can start on your phone and run in the background on your desktop while you do other things. - GPT-Live voice upgrade: A new generation of voice interaction where you can interrupt, respond naturally mid-sentence, and hold more fluid back-and-forth conversations. Available now for Go, Plus, and Pro users. - Codex in the ChatGPT desktop app: Codex, OpenAI's coding agent, now lives inside the main ChatGPT desktop app alongside Chat and Work rather than as a separate tool. For non-developers this matters because it makes automating file and task workflows more accessible from one place.
0
0
1h •
📰 AI News: SpaceXAI Launches Grok 4.5, Its First Model Since Going Public and Buying Cursor 📰
📝 TL;DR 📝 SpaceXAI released Grok 4.5 on July 8, its first model since going public and acquiring the AI coding tool Cursor for $60 billion. Elon Musk is calling it "Opus-class," roughly comparable to Anthropic's Opus 4.7, at a fraction of the price: $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output, versus Opus 4.8's $5 and $25. Independent testing backs the cost story more than the capability claim: Grok 4.5 lands fourth on a real-world agentic benchmark, behind the newest Claude models, but uses roughly four times fewer output tokens on coding tasks, which meaningfully changes total cost per completed job. 🧠 Overview 🧠 This is SpaceXAI's first release since two major structural changes: going public, and acquiring Cursor, one of the most widely used AI coding tools, in a deal reportedly valued at $60 billion. Grok 4.5 was trained jointly with the Cursor team, and the positioning reflects that lineage directly. This is not being marketed as a general chatbot upgrade. It is aimed squarely at coding, agentic workflows, and knowledge work, the same territory Anthropic's Opus and Claude Code, and OpenAI's newly launched GPT-5.6 family, are competing in. The launch also landed on an unusually crowded day for frontier AI. OpenAI rolled out GPT-5.6 publicly the same week, after a staggered release tied to government review. For the first time in months, all three major US AI labs, OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceXAI, have current flagship-tier models publicly available at roughly the same moment. 📜 The Announcement 📜 Musk introduced Grok 4.5 directly on X: "It is an Opus-class model, but faster, more token-efficient and lower cost," later clarifying, "Our internal assessment is that Grok 4.5 is roughly comparable to Opus 4.7, but much faster." That comparison is notable for what it does and does not claim: Opus 4.7 is a prior Claude generation, not Anthropic's current frontier model. SpaceXAI's own published benchmark charts show Grok 4.5 beating Opus 4.8 on two of four coding benchmarks and losing on the other two, with Anthropic's Fable 5 leading most of those charts outright. The company has been fairly candid about this positioning: it says Grok 4.5 beats some rival models on speed, price, and performance, but not the largest, latest models from those same competitors.
0
0
1-30 of 19,968
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
+500
2
+332
3
+274
4
+148
5
+135
Powered by