User
Write something
Pinned
🗽 START HERE: How to join our Group Calls!
We built this community for people who want to talk, not just scroll. The real action happens in our group calls, where we argue ideas in good faith and tackle the week's biggest global events. Here is how you can participate: 🔥 1. Open Calls These are our public town halls. Open to everyone. Whether you want to take the stage to challenge a point or just listen in, this is the "public square." 💎2. Premium Calls For members who want to go deeper. These calls are exclusive to our supporters and offer a space for more focused discussion and priority access. - 📅 Check the Schedule & Join Here: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar - 💎 Become a Premium Member: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/plans Heads up: We believe these conversations are worth sharing! Our group calls are recorded and may be posted to our social media channels. By joining the stage, you’re helping us bring these important discussions to a larger audience. By participating in group calls and voice discussions, you consent to being recorded. 👋 New to the group? Say hello! We want to get to know you. Drop a comment below to introduce yourself. Tell us where you're from and what you like to do for fun (outside of arguing politics!). Welcome to the community!
Why border lines drawn with a ruler in WW1 still rock the Middle East
This is a complete overview of the super mess both the British and the French did in the middle east and even in North Africa. The land assigned to the Jews as the land of Israel, by the European union in 1920, was nearly the complete original land of Israel from 3,000 years ago. Then the bad British decided, 2 years later, to take over 70% of that land and establish Jordan and gave it to the Hashemite tribe from Arabia to rule. They needed to escape from the Saudi tribe which was going to rule Saudi Arabia. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25299553
0
0
Facts vs Political Myth-Making: The Empirical Reality of Domestic Terrorism in the USA.
The current administration’s rhetoric—and the broader discourse in certain parts of American society—often portrays left-wing extremism as a primary domestic terrorist threat. But the federal government’s own research—and studies from independent academics, peer-reviewed criminological research, intelligence agencies, and even libertarian policy institutions—tell a very different story. According to the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice: “Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.” (Chermak et al., 2024) This conclusion is corroborated by peer-reviewed criminological research demonstrating that far-right extremist violence has been significantly more prevalent and lethal than far-left violence in the United States (Duran, 2021). Federal intelligence agencies have reached similar conclusions. A joint strategic assessment by the FBI and Department of Homeland Security found that racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists (RMVEs)—a category that includes white supremacist and far-right ideological actors—were responsible for the most lethal domestic extremist violence and assessed that they “likely would continue to be the most lethal DVE threat to the Homeland” (FBI & DHS, 2021). Yet this same NIJ article was later removed from the DOJ website, as documented in official congressional materials and reported by independent media (U.S. House of Representatives, 2025; Mediaite, 2025). Why remove publicly funded research that informs citizens about the empirical reality of domestic terrorism? Independent academic analysis further confirms these findings. Sociology professors Art Lipson and Paul Becker conclude: “Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001… By contrast, left-wing extremist incidents… have made up about 10% to 15% of incidents and less than 5% of fatalities.” (Lipson & Becker, 2025)
1-30 of 1,964
Liberty Politics Discussion
skool.com/libertypolitics
Talk politics with others who care, in live calls and community posts. Share your views, ask questions, or just listen in.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by