Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Liberty Politics Discussion

4.4k members • Free

39 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
“We will cut your energy prices in half within…*mark it down*..twelve months.” - Donald J. Trump.
https://x.com/patriottakes/status/2046951316900004049?s=20 He said we could “get angry” at him if he doesn’t do it. Has he followed through with this or no?
1 like • 2h
@Daniel Bell What?! Are you telling me that the great leader, Donnie T., lied?
0 likes • 2h
@Darko Leskovšek Oh yes, the good that is a classic MAGA discourse move.
Two diseases
There are two diseases in modernity, one is leftism and the other is Islam. Liberals are cancerous and must be eradicated, removed and repressed from relapsing. I do not for one second question my genuine hatred for anything the left stands, even in the slightest possible regards, is repugnant beyond belief. Islam couldn't materialise in the west without the aid of the left. In spite of that, the damage Islam does to the west is irreversible deep especially culturally. But if there must be a decision to make to destroy the left or Islam, I will always always choose to destroy the left. The left is the bigger and biggest problem to human survival. Islam is the symptom, leftism is the virus. I like to call it the red plague, most fittingly so, when you consider how none of the socialist variants have ever benefitted humanity, but deaths, war, famine and greed. There are cultural socialism (wokism), Marxist socialism (communism), National Socialism (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartie). Then there were two retards, FDR and Truman. They are both the greatest sinners to the modern leftist problem, these two presidents are nearly solely responsible for the rise of waves after waves of communist regimes and led to immense suffering. Till this day, the consequences of their inaction is immeasurable but I am confident to believe had there been a proper leader, there will be countless rewritten histories and today will be a safer place!
0 likes • 4h
You forgot Christian Nationalism, White Supremacism, and Fascism, which in the USA are far greater threats than “wokist leftism” or any other left-leaning group. But this administration would not want you to think that because it would shatter the vision they have reinforced and that many of the MAGA followers have adopted as part of their view of the world. I recommend reading this. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20260211/118951/HHRG-119-JU00-20260211-SD042.pdf I am surprised you mentioned FDR as “sinners” and as responsible for the “waves of communist regimes,” because this sounds like far-right, Christian Nationalist-type of rhetoric. The claim “Islam couldn’t materialize in the west if it wasn’t for leftists support” where did you get that from? Any scholarly or academic references for the FDR claim and the “Islam couldn’t materialize in the ‘West’ if it wasn’t for the left”? These are some interesting historical takes.
An honest take on Christianity
the New Testament has anti-Jewish material baked into its foundation — not footnotes, the core narrative. Collective guilt for the death of Jesus pinned on the Jewish people across all generations (1). Replacement theology — the claim that Jews are no longer God's people and the church has taken their place (2). Jews portrayed throughout the gospels as betrayers, liars, children of the devil (3). This is the text itself, not a minority reading. I judge the doctrine, not the individual Christian. Today's generation can be kind, and often is. But people change, cultures change, politics change — the text does not. It sits there waiting for whoever decides to actually follow it. That is exactly why the text is the subject worth discussing, not the mood of the current generation. (1) Collective guilt: Matthew 27:25 — "And all the people answered, 'His blood be on us and on our children!'" Matthew 23:35-36 — "that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah... Truly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation." 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 — "the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind... But wrath has come upon them at last!" See also: Matthew 23:31-32; Acts 7:51-52. (2) Replacement theology: Matthew 21:43 — "the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits." Galatians 4:30 — "Cast out the slave woman and her son, for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman." (Paul's own allegory: the "slave woman" = the Sinai covenant.) Hebrews 8:13 — "In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." See also: Galatians 6:16; Philippians 3:3; Hebrews 10:9. (3) Betrayers, liars, children of the devil: John 8:44 — "You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires... he is a liar and the father of lies."
0 likes • 14h
@Linda Weinmunson What do you know what I read or not? Go read the New Testament and tell me what you think. To me it has may antijudaic instances. The gospel of Matthew has many examples. Also, I am just a guy on the internet with no real political influence; it would have been great if previous Christian leaders knew how to read the Bible in a friendlier way but unfortunately history shows that in many crucial moments they did not. Countless of Christians throughout the centuries did not stop from imputing sins onto the innocent children of those creatures they deemed particularly sinful (Jewish people, women, atheists, etc.) because of their texts and their readings of them.
0 likes • 13h
@Linda Weinmunson What? Me taking it out of context? In what sense is that part of Revelations a message to the church of Philadelphia? And yes, I understand the part in the book of Revelations or Apocalipsis as we call it in Spanish. Do you see how when you say that the title “Synagogue of Satan” is reserved to those who claim to followers of God but are deceitful is the formation of a stereotype that somehow also fits the role of Jews in the New Testament? This is akin to the reference to the Antichrist (anyone that denies that Jesus Christ) in the gospel of John (this is also where Jesus calls his Jewish opponents sons of the devil) which basically implies Jews.
Persian Gulf
Genuine question. Why does this slimy POS Hegseth keep mispronouncing the Persian Gulf and calling it Arabian gulf. Does he not have an education or is he just retarded?
2 likes • 4d
Haha he might be retarded, it was great seeing him quote the Pulp Fiction-inspired bible line and calling the media “Pharisees”…. A good day for comedy.
1 like • 3d
@Johan J I wouldn’t call it an argument, I think it is more like a title we are giving him, and could you please take us to deep waters, captain?
islamism as early european marxism in disguise
lately had to meet such point that states that modern islamism has the same binary system of values, as the marxism where there are the “bad” capitalists vs the “good” oppressed and victims of the capitalists… and they use it as an expression tool. to me it seems legit, but i would like to know what others think about it.
0 likes • 4d
@Marius Andresen I can tell you really like your Rand and Liberterianism. Condemning Soviet atrocities is easy—we agree. But that doesn’t show Objectivism is the only coherent defense of capitalism. Utilitarianism defends markets based on outcomes, not ideology, and real-world evidence shows unregulated markets can produce harm (inequality, externalities) that reduce overall welfare. What evidence shows Rand’s framework consistently produces better outcomes than mixed systems? If the goal is human well-being, why privilege self-interest as a moral absolute instead of judging systems by the outcomes they actually produce?
0 likes • 4d
@Daniel Dom Would you say Christians also fall into that category as well? The righteous and the wicked? What about Nationalism? Fascism? Zoroastrianism? These ^ are not “we and them” philosophies?
1-10 of 39
Oscar Paez
5
308points to level up
@oscar-paez-4083
San Diego/Tijuana

Active 2h ago
Joined Dec 7, 2025
Powered by