User
Write something
High Tea is happening in 6 days
Pinned
1983.
The past will tell you the future.
Pinned
Welcome to Clief Notes. Here's where to start.
1. Watch the intro video and introduce yourself in the intro post here 2. Start with The Foundation (free course). Concepts, folder architecture, prompting framework. Everything else builds on this. 3. Check in at the bottom of each lesson. Polls, discussion posts, other members working through the same stuff. Use them. 4. When you're ready to build real things, move to Implementation Playbooks (Level 2). When you're ready to build your own tools, Building Your Stack (Level 3). 5. Post your work. Ask questions. Help others when you can. What are you here to build?
Poll
5922 members have voted
Pinned
Companies want to hire from Clief Notes. So we're building this.
Been sitting on this for a few weeks and figured it's time to show you. 👀 Over the last month, three companies have reached out asking the same thing. How do we hire people from Clief Notes. They've seen what folks here are building with ICM and they want that on their teams. Not LinkedIn AI experts. Not Coursera grads. People who can actually ship. So we're building it. 🛠️ talent.eduba.io Heads up, that's a demo. No real backend, no signups, no live data. Click around and you'll see what the full thing is going to be. A private platform where you list yourself with a real portfolio, companies browse, and they request an intro through us. We make the intro. You take it from there. Few things worth knowing. 🔍 Every profile gets reviewed by the Eduba team before it goes live. The quality bar is the whole point. 🔒 Companies don't see your last name, your employer, or your contact info until we make a formal intro. You can block your current employer too, plus five more companies if you want. Nobody you don't want seeing you sees you. You can list as actively looking, open to offers, or not looking. Passive welcome. Honestly most of the strongest people we've trained are employed and plan to stay that way until the right thing shows up. That's fine. Sit on the platform, see what comes through. 💰 When a placement happens you get a $500 to $1,000 bonus after 90 days in the role. On top of whatever you negotiate. We pay you for staying. This is why the community matters. Companies aren't asking us for resumes. They're asking us for the people who already get it. ICM, agent architecture, knowing when not to use AI. That's not on a LinkedIn profile. Go click around. Tell me what's missing, what's confusing, what you want to see when the real thing ships. We're already building it. 🚀
Plumbline - My Code building process through files and folders.
I built a coding workflow called Plumbline (https://github.com/BytesFromToby/plumbline) — five AI-agent "skills" that take a feature from idea to verified code. The names lean on a home-building metaphor on purpose: an architect defines what to build, a foreman plans how, a builder writes the code, an inspector signs off. A plumb line is the weighted string a builder hangs to find true vertical — the one reference everything else is checked against. In my workflow, the spec is that line. One way to wire this is a chain: architect calls foreman, foreman calls builder. I deliberately didn't. The agents never call each other. They coordinate entirely through files and folders — and that one choice turned out to be the most important in the whole thing. Chaining them causes two problems: tight coupling, where a failure halfway means restarting the whole pipeline; and — worse with LLMs — a telephone game, where each agent paraphrases the last one's output until the builder is working from a summary of a summary of what I actually asked for. # The fix: the filesystem is the interface Every stage reads and writes plain files in a known layout: Planning/specs/[feature]_spec.md ← architect writes this; it's the source of truth Planning/blueprints/[feature]_BP.md ← foreman writes the build plan output/inspect/ ← inspector drops evidence + a PASS/FAIL stamp A stage's input is whichever files already exist; its output is whatever it writes. No call graph. The builder runs after the blueprint exists — sequenced by data dependency, not because the foreman told it to. A single CLAUDE.md in each project declares the shared contract (test command, where specs live, the rules for a change) — the schema that lets independently-run agents agree on where everything is without ever talking. # Why it's better than I expected Every stage runs standalone — the pipeline is a suggestion, not a cage. Intent stops drifting: every stage reads the original spec, not a retelling of it, so the builder checks against what I actually asked for and stops if the plan contradicts it. Independence becomes structural: my inspector only reads the finished files and never saw the build, so its neutrality is enforced by isolation, not good intentions. And everything is inspectable — when something breaks I read the files, not a black-box conversation.
🏁 Foundations 2.4 Check-In
You just learned the book, movie, video game framework. Vote below, then tell us in the comments: name one thing in your work that you now realize is on the wrong layer.
Poll
564 members have voted
1-30 of 1,325
Clief Notes
skool.com/cliefnotes
Jake Van Clief, giving you the Cliff notes on the new AI age.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by