I know we’ve all seen @Jake Van Clief ’s post https://www.skool.com/cliefnotes/each-dot-is-32-million-people?p=c222c789 I see things like this all the time leading me to believe that we are all ahead of the curve when it comes to this stuff. But then I see things like the attached photo. I see so much content about AI adoption in companies and different people talking about how they use it. I also see so much content about deals with large orgs and deals they have with anthropic or OpenAI. I often wonder what this looks like. Are people sitting down implementing the same methods as us? Or is it an army of people chatting with Claude and leaving it there. Does anyone have any inside info on how these large companies are implementing this tech? Are the adoption percentages we are told accurate? I feel like the truth is somewhere in the middle like with most things.

Hi everyone 👋 The .md format is great for human readability but for LLM it is well known json or xml works better because they are more structured. Claude is trained on XML data. So my thoughts and questions for you is if we replace context, example and reference md files with .xml format, would the ICM perform better? I would leave CLAUDE.md since the name is embedded in the Claude itself. My guess is it would improve but it’s been only a few days since I adopted the system and did not test yet. And if so, would that be meaningful improvement? I will update what I find out in the next weeks.