My workflow is simple: I brainstorm the build with a design chat, it writes the prompts, and I run those in Claude Code. The hard part was never writing the prompts - it was giving each fresh chat enough context to actually be useful, and my fix is to front-load the entire system in a single paste, so the only thing left to type is the new idea. One command builds the bundle. Four things go into it: - The operating instructions - how the system runs, and how I want the chat to talk back to me. - The prompt structure - how to write a Claude Code work order, stamped to the chat it came from. - The orchestrator profile - a curated model of how I think and the calls I have already made. - The live maps - the folder dictionary and the current state of the system, freshest last. The whole thing is a priming script. One command assembles those files into a single document in a fixed order, stamps it with a banner, and writes it out fresh. It is deliberately throwaway: regenerated on every run, never hand-edited, pasted whole into a new worker bee at spawn. Part of it is stable, the operating docs and the profile, and part of it changes every run, the live state map, which sits last so it is the freshest thing the chat reads before it starts. The prompt-structure file earns its place more than it sounds like it would. I have my Claude Code jobs write a touchdown at close, a short record of what the job actually did, and every work order is stamped with the chat it came from. That stamp is what lets me trace a problem back to the exact session that caused it, which becomes training data for improving the system over time. Run the same setup in a business with multiple teams and the stamp points at a person instead of a chat, so you can see whose workflow a recurring issue traces back to. The orchestrator profile is the part I would not build without now. It is a curated file the system maintains about how I actually reason and decide: that I want decisions not options, plain English over jargon, the honest downside rather than a comfortable read. It rides in every bundle, so a fresh chat is conditioned on my nuance before it has said a word, and I spend far less time correcting it back onto line.

Has anyone in the community utilized this structure? Any words of wisdom? I'm jumping in head first into a game based learning app and was insanely overwhelmed at the thought of figuring out how to structure everything considering I have zero game engineering experience. I used the Prompt structure to educate myself on the vocabulary etc etc and this was one of the resources listed in the Output from Claude. https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios/tree/main It's late, I'm tired and signing off in a moment, but my thoughts about where to start tomorrow are to set up a Pre-Development Project for the purpose of getting prepared to customize the structure above for my project. In "Project Pre-Dev" my goal will be to fairly efficiently provide Claude with the context needed to help me with the customization of the entire structure. Is that crazy or am I on the right track? On one hand it seems redundant, but on the other hand, I think that I could essentially break the setup down into distinct projects and save myself a lot of slogging around trying to decide what to do in chat sessions.