Lesson (re)learned: It takes indirect AND direct
Over the last two days, I sent a couple emails to my list that were pure offer: The subject line spelled out the offer and who it's for... ... the body repeated it and explained it, including talking about money, down to the cent... ... there was zero infotainment. One of those emails was offering readers to have me run an auction for them, so that for every $10k in sales I made them, they just send me $2.5k after the money lands in their bank account. The other email offered readers $1.5k or 10% of my earnings from the auction, whichever was bigger, if they could refer an auction partner for me. Result: I got a bunch of qualified responses to both emails. That's kind of weird, or at least it seemed that way to me. That's because over the past couple months, I've written a bunch of emails to my list, sharing interesting stories and conclusions from my auction, and ending with an offer to run an auction for partners. Over the past year or two, I've also sent out several handraiser emails, Dean Jackson-style, calling out people who could potentially refer me partners for things like auctions (eg. "Do you run FB ads for clients?") And while I got replies to both my infotaining emails with an auction offer and my completely blind handraisers... it didn't really lead anywhere. Who knows, maybe all the leads I got in reply to my emails over the past couple days won't lead anywhere either. But the point is this: Sending indirect emails (infotainment, or symptomatic handraiser emails) called out one segment of my audience... Sending direct emails (pure offer, spelled out, including who it's for and who it's not for), called out another segment of my audience. It should be obvious enough that you have to send both direct, offer-based appeals, and indirect or infotaining appeals... ... and yet here I am, 8 years into running a daily email newsletter, and 10 years into doing email marketing, relearning this lesson. I figured it might be worth reminding you of it as well.