Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Skip

OpenClaw Enterprise

3 members • Free

Building OpenClaw Solutions for Enterprise Level Efforts.

Memberships

Making Better Agents

632 members • Free

Easy Machine AI

1.8k members • Free

Openclaw Labs

2k members • Free

Dopamine Digital

6.8k members • Free

Openclaw Founders

848 members • Free

OpenClaw Users

903 members • Free

Voice AI Alliance

3.5k members • Free

Flow State

1.4k members • Free

No-Code Nation

3.4k members • Free

6 contributions to Content Academy
Join The Live on Tuesday 2/3 @ 11am (4 Important Topics)
🔴 Live Stream – Tuesday, February 3rd at 11 AM >> CALENDAR << I'll be covering four topics I've been digging into lately: 1. OpenClaw (aka Maltbot/Clawdbot) Going beyond the surface on this one — I'll break down the lesser-known underlying framework that powers OpenClaw and what makes it interesting. 2. Remotion.dev + AI Video Orchestration I've been building an MCP that connects to various AI APIs and Airtable to manage assets and orchestrate video creation — scenes, segments, faceless videos, demo videos, etc. I'll walk through what's possible with Remotion as a web-based video editor paired with Claude Code. 3. Running Your Own Local LLM If you're going to have an AI agent/assistant running 24/7, paying for expensive models like Claude around the clock isn't practical. I'll share my thinking on how to set up a local machine running models like DeepSeek or Kimi for always-on tasks, while reserving premium models for when you actually need them. 4. AI Chat Interfaces as a SaaS Framework I built a YouTube Strategist SaaS (thumbnail help, research, etc.) on top of a framework I created for launching chat-based SaaS apps quickly. The idea: instead of designing complex UI for every feature, give an LLM the right tools and let the chat interface handle it. I'll demo the app and walk through the framework. Hope to see you there! 🎙️
Join The Live on Tuesday 2/3 @ 11am (4 Important Topics)
3 likes • Feb 2
I built a security hardening tool for OpenClaw deployments that might help. GitHub: https://github.com/pottertech/openclaw-secure-start 🦞🔒
Sell This AI Voice Agent For $5K (Viral Content System)
To get access to the templates (and KEDB Solo) join the NCA Community. Learn how to build an AI voice agent that turns simple messages into viral content! In this video, I show you how to create a powerful Telegram-based content creation system that content creators would pay thousands for. Watch as I build this step-by-step: ✅ Create a Telegram bot (handles text + voice) ✅ Build an MCP server to process content requests ✅ Set up a database to store and organize content ✅ And we'll discuss 3 way to monetize the system This automation lets you capture content ideas on the go, refine them with AI, and publish them instantly - all from your phone! Perfect for busy creators or as a high-value product you can sell for $5K+.
5 likes • May '25
Nice work!
1 like • Jun '25
@Sajid Ali I setup NCA Toolkit and use it to connect to some FREE S3 storage via Scaleway. It supports auto-deleting files in a bucket so I use it for TEMP storage during processing and its set for file deletion after 3 days so I never hit the limits and never pay anything at all. The UI is not the best but it works once you figure out how to use it, https://www.scaleway.com/en/pricing/storage/
The Power of Context And Gut Instinct in a World of Infinite Advice
In today's information-saturated world, we face a paradox: unlimited access to advice yet increasing confusion about which path to follow. This reality reveals a crucial truth that's often overlooked: **there is no right way without context**. Without context, there is no right way. Why is this concept so vital right now? With the overwhelming amount of information bombarding us daily, with countless experts offering contradictory advice, navigation becomes nearly impossible. While there certainly exists an optimal path for each individual at any specific moment, that path can only be identified with proper context. This context includes crucial questions: Is the person giving advice qualified to do so? Is the recipient at the right stage to implement it? Does the advice actually address the specific problem at hand? In our current landscape, advice flows freely without these contextual boundaries. Solutions are presented as universal truths without regard for who's listening, their experience level, or their actual challenges. Without this essential framing, even the most well-intentioned guidance becomes meaningless and potentially distracting. The hierarchy of advice further complicates matters. What benefits beginners often hinders experts. Guidance designed to elevate intermediates to advanced status proves useless or counterproductive for newcomers, even when it sounds compelling. Priorities shift dramatically across experience levels—what's crucial for professional athletes may be irrelevant for beginners. Adding to this confusion, some individuals misrepresent their experience, offering advice that genuinely applies to no one. So how do we navigate this maze of contextless guidance? Two paths emerge: 1. **Actively seek context** - Determine whether investing time to gather the complete picture is worthwhile for your situation. 2. **Trust your intuition** - Perhaps the most underutilized resource in modern society is our own internal guidance system.
3 likes • Apr '25
Well said!
Fact vs Feelings: The Obvious Secret to Business Growth
I want to talk about the true secret in business that no one seems to discuss. I think about this whenever people ask me, "How do I come up with product ideas? How do I develop that perfect product strategy?" It's initially irritating because there isn't a magic formula. There are frameworks for validating ideas, but no secret to developing a good product. At its core, it's simply talking to customers about their problems and creating a better solution than what exists. The real secret is that you must show people your ideas and get their feedback. In my experience, people often complete the entire idea validation process alone. They conceive an idea, get excited about it, and then abandon it - all without any external input. There is a process people can follow to validate ideas, and it's about gathering facts and making decisions based on evidence instead of feelings. Creating a good product begins with idea generation. Perhaps you've encountered a similar problem yourself or a client mentioned an issue they're facing. What typically happens next is people overthink instead of seeking feedback. They exhaust themselves mentally, decide the idea won't work because nobody's buying it (even though nobody knows about it), and move on to a new idea to repeat the cycle. My best advice: make it factual. To develop a product from initial concept to viable offering, you need to speak with at least 30-40 people before gaining any real insight. Talking to just 1-2 people is not validation - the sample is too small. You need to speak with 30-50 people. You'll start getting valuable insights around the 10th to 15th conversation, but you must go further than most are willing. Document these sessions and record your insights. Turn it into a scientific process. It doesn't need to be complicated - a simple spreadsheet tracking who you spoke with, what they said, their feedback, and whether they might purchase your solution is sufficient. This is a proven scientific approach to tackling unknowns.
4 likes • Mar '25
Very interesting.
I Wasted $2 on GPT-4.5 for THIS… (Here’s Why Sonnet 3.7 DOMINATES AI-Generated Code)
I tested 3 top LLMs (GPT-4.5, Sonnet 3.7, Gemini 2.0) head-to-head to build a functional solar lead form with webhook integration. Here’s the raw breakdown: 🔥 Key Takeaways for Busy Builders: - Sonnet 3.7 Wins (87¢ cost): Generated 95% production-ready code after minor tweaks - Gemini 2.0 (Free Tier): Fast but messy – required 3x revisions to fix CSS/flow - GPT-4.5 FLOPS ($2 wasted): Broken design, non-functional JS, and ignored spec 💻 Behind-the-Scenes Drama: - Token Wars: GPT-4.5 burned 24k tokens for garbage vs. Sonnet’s lean 53k for gold - The “Separate Files” Trap: Why GPT-4.5’s multi-file output kills real-world workflows - Speed vs. Accuracy: Gemini’s “sprint” vs. Sonnet’s “marathon” (and why slow wins) 👇 Watch the Full Video HERE
0 likes • Mar '25
If it ain't broke, don't change it. Chasing updated versions fueled by "hype" and larger version numbers will always kill any working automatons your have not to mention eat up your most precious commodity..., time.
1-6 of 6
Skip Potter
2
2points to level up
@skip-potter-6615
Author, Engineer, Educator, Consultant & AI Automationist

Online now
Joined Feb 18, 2025
Virginia, United States
Powered by