I have been playing around with building a automation that will reply to the instantly warmup emails that come into my google workspaces accounts. Just having that one extra signal showing google a little more trust. I have only set it up on 6 inboxes to test it out and it is working. Replying 30-40% to the warm up emails instantly sends, mark them important, and replies durning business hours. Now I have 250 workspace inboxes yet to put into this automation. Don't want to waste my time If anyone here can tell me that it won't help much and I am just wasting my time. Or should I just test it? Thoughts?

Most people use Claude like a slightly smarter Google Doc. That’s why their copy still sounds generic. Here’s a simple prompt framework I use that instantly makes scripts, landing pages, and ads sound 10x better: 👉 The 3 Voice Protocol Instead of asking Claude for “better copy”… I make it write in 3 completely different styles from copywriters I respect. Voice 1: The Street Fighter (John Carlton style) • punchy • aggressive • high urgency • attention-grabbing Perfect for: short-form videos, hooks, ads, cold outreach. Voice 2: The Anti-Hero (Ben Settle style) • polarizing • relationship-driven • conversational • strong opinions Perfect for: emails, personal brands, community content. Voice 3: The Strategist (Dan Kennedy style) • logical persuasion • authority-driven • premium positioning • high-ticket trust Perfect for: landing pages, offers, VSLs, consulting. Now instead of getting ONE version from Claude… You instantly get 3 high-level angles. And honestly? Usually one version massively outperforms the others. I used this recently on a short-form script rewrite and the difference was insane. Same idea. Completely different feel depending on the voice. If you want the full prompt: Comment “PROMPT” below 👇

What's up 👋 I'm part of Jay's team, and I spend a lot of time looking at why cold email campaigns underperform. So here's something I see constantly: Smart operators, good offers, decent lists… getting crushed reply rates because of mistakes that have nothing to do with sending more. Here are the 3 that show up most: Mistake #1: You're writing to everyone. The second your email could've been sent to 500 people unchanged, it's dead. The inbox can smell a template from a mile away. Mistake #2: You're pitching in email #1. You haven't earned the right to ask for anything yet. The first email has exactly one job, and it's not booking a call. Mistake #3: You're optimizing the wrong number. Everyone obsesses over open rates and send volume. Meanwhile the number that actually predicts revenue is sitting there ignored, and most people don't even know the line where they should start worrying. Here's the part most people miss: Fixing this isn't about working harder or sending more. It's about knowing where you're leaking. And most people have no idea which one is theirs. So I built a checklist. It's the exact reply-rate teardown I use on campaigns. Fair warning: it goes deeper than these 3. You go line by line, and by the end you know exactly what's bleeding your replies and what to do about it. If you want it… Comment "Audit" below 👇 I'll get it straight to you.

You’re capped at ~100 connection requests per week. So what do most people do? They try to push harder… Send faster… Stretch the limits… And end up getting restricted or flagged. Here’s the reality: You can’t scale LinkedIn with one account. Try to force it… And LinkedIn shuts you down. So what actually works? You stop thinking single account… and start thinking system. The approach we use 👇 Instead of sending from one profile… We use multiple pre-warmed LinkedIn accounts that look like real team members. • proper profile pictures • work history • existing connections • natural activity Everything LinkedIn expects to see. Now instead of: ➡️ 1 account → ~100 requests/week You get: ➡️ 10 accounts → ~900+ requests/week What this actually does You’re not just increasing volume… You’re: • spreading risk across accounts • protecting your main profile • scaling safely without triggering limits The result? We went from: ~10 meetings/week → to ~90 meetings/week Same offer. Same messaging. Just better infrastructure. This is how agencies actually scale LinkedIn outreach without burning accounts. Not hacks. Not shortcuts. Just the right setup. If you want to see exactly how this works and how to set it up properly… Comment “Aimfox” below 👇