So, over the past few weeks - I've been neck deep into working with PIpecat, LiveKit and Vibe Coding. Mainly, I wanted to see what kind of milage I can get from Vibe Coding tools, and in order to test it - what's a better way than build a Pipecat/LiveKit implementation? So, I decided to examine 3 primary tools: - Claude Code - Using Sonnet 3.5 (using CLI) - OpenCode - Grok Code Fast 1 - Google Antigravity - Using Gemini 2.5 Below are my conclusions, split into several categories. 💵 Financials: Most expensive to use - Claude Code Least expensive to use - OpenCode 😡 Developer Experience: Best experience - Google Antigravity Worst experience - Claude Code 💪 Reliability: Most reliable - Claude Code Least reliable - OpenCode 🚅 Performance: Fastest planning and building - Google Antigravity Slowest planning and building - OpenCode So, overall - there is no "one tool to rule them all" here - and what I found out that each tool is really good at performing specific tasks. Here is what I've learned about how to "leverage" these tools in order to build something successful: - Planning can be performed with either OpenCode of Google antigravity. Google provides free developer credits for Antigravity, and their deep-thinking and reasoning engine, when applied to software architecture and design works very well. - Backend development with either ClaudeCode or Google Antigravity. When coupled with proper topic sub-agents, these are really powerful tools. For some odd reason, Claude Code is far more capable at handling complex architectures, while Google Antigravity leans towards the "hacker style" coding. - UI/UIX development - without any question, OpenCode did a better job. It was far more capable in spitting out hundreds of lines of working UI/UX code - even faster that Claude. However, if at some point it gets stuck on a specific UI component package, it may require Claude to show it the light - so pay attention to what it's doing. - Code Review, Security and Privacy - without any question, Claude is the winner here - with potentially the most extensive availability of sub-agent topic experts.

I'm just curious in what platforms are you building and the pros and cons of each one.

Has anyone successfully integrated LiveKit with Asterisk?

Hi All, I'm new to the group and wanted to share a project I've been working on. This past week, I built a Voice AI and Text Chatbot customer support platform for businesses to easily set up their own AI Customer Support agents. Check out the demo video below and let me know what you think of it so far. Demo: https://www.loom.com/share/d39cbafebe664efda3ff059e0226fd4c Tech stack: AI & Voice LLM Framework: Agno (for text agent) Voice Framework: LiveKit Agents SDK LLM Provider: OpenAI (GPT-4) TTS/STT: OpenAI (Whisper for STT, TTS-1 for speech) Voice Options: OpenAI voices + ElevenLabs integration Real-time Communication: LiveKit (WebRTC) Integrations Calendar: Google Calendar API, Microsoft Exchange (planned) SMS/Voice: Twilio WhatsApp: Twilio (via WhatsApp Business API) Instagram: Twilio Channels (planned) Security: Custom encryption for credentials (Fernet)