Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Business Builders Club

3k members • Free

Merkle Entrepreneurs

2.6k members • Free

AI Automation Society

249.6k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

290.5k members • Free

6 contributions to AI Automation Society
I'm stuck. Need fresh eyes on this.
You know that feeling when someone says, "Yes, send it over!" then completely ghosts after you deliver? That's where I'm at. The context: I run Optigent. We help companies fix unclear messaging using StoryBrand, then build automation to scale it. My LinkedIn approach: Find someone with confusing messaging → offer free website audit → deliver detailed diagnosis → invite to discovery call to explore working together. What's working: Everything up to the audit. 50%+ acceptance rates, people are genuinely interested, and audits are thorough. What's NOT: After I send the report... crickets. No "thanks," no questions, no discovery call bookings. Even the ones who seemed excited disappear. They've got a specific diagnosis of their problem. But there's zero momentum toward actually fixing it. My question: Is the audit solving the problem for free, so there's no reason to continue? Am I not creating enough urgency? Is this just normal conversion rates, or do I need way more volume? Has anyone cracked the "value delivered, now what?" gap? Genuinely stuck here.
Welcome! Introduce yourself + share a career goal you have 🎉
Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊
3 likes • 13d
Hey everyone 👋 I'm RJ, the guy running Optigent, currently based in Singapore. We help companies fix their unclear messaging using StoryBrand, then build them the marketing automations to scale it. You might be wondering why this might matter to you: If you're an automation builder, you probably face the same challenge I see everywhere - brilliant technical work, but websites that sound like everyone else's. "We help you automate your business with AI" doesn't win clients. Clear, differentiated messaging does. Or maybe you have clients asking for messaging/marketing automation, but it's not your core focus. That's where partnerships could make sense. Either way, happy to be here and learn from what you're all building. I'd love to connect and hear more about what you are working on! 😉
Website!? 🤔
In ai automation agency do we need a website? I am just starting out. But I can't afford a website in general time now it's sale so I can afford now . So what should I do ?
1 like • 13d
You don’t need a website to get started. What you do need is a clear way to explain what you offer, proof that you can deliver results, and a method for potential clients to contact you. The key is to ensure that whatever you use clearly communicates the problem you solve. It should be simple and direct. You can create a fancy website once you start generating revenue. 😄
Learning AI Automation Together (No Hype)
Hey everyone 👋 This year has been a lot for people trying to build online, AI moving fast, tools changing weekly, automation feeling overwhelming instead of freeing. I’ve noticed many of us aren’t stuck because we’re lazy or lack ideas… we’re stuck because there’s too much noise and not enough clarity. As a digital marketer, my focus this year is simple: help people turn AI + automation into something practical, not confusing. No hype. No “just automate everything” advice. Just real workflows, clear systems, and small wins that actually save time and make money. If you’re feeling overwhelmed, stuck between learning and executing, or unsure how to apply what you’re seeing here, know you’re not alone. I’m happy to share what’s working for me, what isn’t, and learn together with this community. Let’s make AI work for us this year, not stress us out. Glad to be here 🤝
3 likes • 13d
Hey, I'm with you with the whole "clarity over hype" approach — that's exactly where the real work happens. The practical workflow focus is what actually scales vs. just sounding good. Would love to connect. Always good to meet people building with the same mindset! 😄
Be honest: which one actually scales?
Quick gut check — no overthinking. When you’re building automations for real users or clients, what actually scales better long-term? A) One simple automation that works 95% of the time B) A complex system that tries to handle every edge case Curious where people really land. 👉 React with A or B and comment why if you’ve been burned by one.
0 likes • 13d
A, every time. The complex system looks impressive in demos but breaks in ways you can't predict. Then you're maintaining edge cases that affect minority of users. As for the simple 95% solution, you know exactly where it doesn't work, so you can decide if those edge cases matter or if manual handling is fine. I've rebuilt enough to know: complexity is debt you pay in maintenance, not value you deliver upfront.
1-6 of 6
@optigent-ai-4541
We fix unclear messaging for firms that struggle to explain what they do, then automate the systems to scale it.

Active 1h ago
Joined Jan 20, 2026
Singapore
Powered by